WHY DO WE NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR SELF CONSCIENCE-NESS AND SELECTIVELY BREED

uh-oh · 08-26-2016, 08:08 AM

a simple look at an african from any african nation compared to basically any african american with ancestry tying back to slavery disproves your opinon. its taboo for scientists to look at racial differences, you'll be blackballed and deemed racist, because what motive is required to actually study such "miniscule" differences between the races? so you're not gonna find credited scientific studies and shit.

but if you think there is no evidence of physicality being passed on you're deluding yourself man

shaq knocked up a regular woman. his 16 year old son is already 7 ft tall. his 12 year old kid is 6'1. i'm 6'1. lmao.

to think selectively breeding for physicality won't show up is nonsense. if yao ming knocked up a 5'0 woman i would bet my life his kids would be at least 6'3.

again i think we have to be arguing for different points. maybe you are thinking im talking about making a new breed of humans altogether? i'm just talking about making giant athletic humans.

lebron james' kids are going to be freaks. because lebron james is a freak. if lebron knocked up serena williams their kid would probably be the greatest athlete of all time. granted its not guaranteed. maybe he'd be slow. but one thing is absolutely certain, he would be a physical specimen in some regard. height/stature.

slave breeding was more in line with getting "healthy" workers though. thats why they would inspect the teeth for instance. if your slave had bad teeth, it could die in those days from infection. you wanted a physically strong slave so he would have the endurance needed. they weren't breeding for size strictly.

the part jimmy the greek forgets is that while what he is saying was basically true, black africans are already superior runners to begin with, east africans are renowned for their endurance in marathons and the like. west africans are superior sprinters. this is all scientific fact.

again there are freaks from every culture but i'm talking in averages.

and you can absolutely find physical traits passed on from even 1 generation. physicality isn't as much of a crapshoot as trying to identify certain genes. like baldness or something. even though they basically tie that to your mothers father. etc

08-26-2016, 08:08 AM	#29
uh-oh DA GOD Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Canton Ohio Posts: 12,362 Battle Record: 1-0 Champed - Beat Battle II - Beat Battle V - Beat Bags Rep Power: 84181420	a simple look at an african from any african nation compared to basically any african american with ancestry tying back to slavery disproves your opinon. its taboo for scientists to look at racial differences, you'll be blackballed and deemed racist, because what motive is required to actually study such "miniscule" differences between the races? so you're not gonna find credited scientific studies and shit. but if you think there is no evidence of physicality being passed on you're deluding yourself man shaq knocked up a regular woman. his 16 year old son is already 7 ft tall. his 12 year old kid is 6'1. i'm 6'1. lmao. to think selectively breeding for physicality won't show up is nonsense. if yao ming knocked up a 5'0 woman i would bet my life his kids would be at least 6'3. again i think we have to be arguing for different points. maybe you are thinking im talking about making a new breed of humans altogether? i'm just talking about making giant athletic humans. lebron james' kids are going to be freaks. because lebron james is a freak. if lebron knocked up serena williams their kid would probably be the greatest athlete of all time. granted its not guaranteed. maybe he'd be slow. but one thing is absolutely certain, he would be a physical specimen in some regard. height/stature. slave breeding was more in line with getting "healthy" workers though. thats why they would inspect the teeth for instance. if your slave had bad teeth, it could die in those days from infection. you wanted a physically strong slave so he would have the endurance needed. they weren't breeding for size strictly. the part jimmy the greek forgets is that while what he is saying was basically true, black africans are already superior runners to begin with, east africans are renowned for their endurance in marathons and the like. west africans are superior sprinters. this is all scientific fact. again there are freaks from every culture but i'm talking in averages. and you can absolutely find physical traits passed on from even 1 generation. physicality isn't as much of a crapshoot as trying to identify certain genes. like baldness or something. even though they basically tie that to your mothers father. etc __________________ EVERYBODY I KNOW GOT WEED OR GOT POWDER BUT I AINT GOT EITHER. GOT ALOT OF DEMONS