Boycotting Kanye (All the black users should agree)

[Diode]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

So I don’t agree with extreme leftist, therefore I’m right wing?

You’re so logical and advanced no wonder you got yourself dat degree man. Truly a great addition to our society.

There's that slippery slope again. Back to sociology 101 for you.

Did I say you were right wing? I said good luck fighting the good fight for poor, overburdened white folks.

Gone @ extreme leftist. I'm a left-leaning moderate at best and boy, if you think I'm extreme, do I have news for you. Hahaha.

Have a good one.

[Amen]

Kanye even got white people going at one another.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Diode

There's that slippery slope again. Back to sociology 101 for you.

Did I say you were right wing? I said good luck fighting the good fight for poor, overburdened white folks.

Gone @ extreme leftist. I'm a left-leaning moderate at best and boy, if you think I'm extreme, do I have news for you. Hahaha.

Have a good one.

So if you strongly imply something it shouldn’t be implied? What about anything I’ve said supports the idea that I think whites people are overburdened?

Inb4 “ not a question”

[Diode]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

So if you strongly imply something it shouldn’t be implied? What about anything I’ve said supports the idea that I think whites people are overburdened?

Inb4 “ not a question”

You've literally argued on this forum that poor white people have it just as bad as minorities in this country. I'm sorry if you decide to turn Seth on and off and that wasn't your actual opinion, in which case, please clarify - but I can only work with what you've posted in the past.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Diode

You've literally argued on this forum that poor white people have it just as bad as minorities in this country. I'm sorry if you decide to turn Seth on and off and that wasn't your actual opinion, in which case, please clarify - but I can only work with what you've posted in the past.

That was Scheinberg lol

Sorry thought that was clear in my thread before.

[Ghost1]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

Also uh oh beats diode currently in their back and forth. You can’t call for inclusion and then call someone a white supremacist over a nitpicked exaggeration. He obviously meant what uh oh said, and means that they aren’t disadvantaged any further.

Can you back your views up with facts? Or are you trolling?

I wrote an academic paper on political correctness recently and learned a lot, you should analyze how the movement contradicts itself and hurts people more than it helps in its current form.

was this scheinberg?

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

was this scheinberg?

Seems you made one area big and another bold

Which are you referring to? If the bolded bit, clarify

[Amen]

Don't you fucking back peddle now, Knuck - stand your ground.

[Ghost1]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

Seems you made one area big and another bold

Which are you referring to? If the bolded bit, clarify

the first part indicating you thought that diode was losing the argument...the 2nd part explaining uh ohs side of the argument....the 3rd part advising diode to research information supporting uh ohs argument, seemed to me to say that you pretty clearly agreed with uh oh............and uh is clearly saying that there is no longer an excuse for black poverty and that they are responsible for their own low class status.........which is exactly what diode is saying that you said.

so I guess that is where im confused when you just said that's not what you are currently saying.......I think diode would agree


if you were just sayng that diode argues like a child ....which is why you thought he was losing the argument.....despite the validity of his position....then say that.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Amen

Don't you fucking back peddle now, Knuck - stand your ground.

Where am I back peddling?

[Ghost1]

so heres my view on his dialogue overall

free thought in the face of biased media propaganda and unconditional love are worthwhile talking points.................. but who the fuck didn't already know about them? and you cant completely eradicate existing socioeconomic disparity and unequal distribution of extreme poverty amongst specific demographics just to make that position work. its really as simple as the fact that kanyes perspective on poverty in America is laughable at best. the fact that hes living a façade and struggling to identify with his target audience almost as much as hes struggling to find base in his own reality should be glaring indicators as to why the information he is offering is so grossly out of touch.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

the first part indicating you thought that diode was losing the argument...the 2nd part explaining uh ohs side of the argument....the 3rd part advising diode to research information supporting uh ohs argument, seemed to me to say that you pretty clearly agreed with uh oh............and uh is clearly saying that there is no longer an excuse for black poverty and that they are responsible for their own low class status.........which is exactly what diode is saying that you said.

so I guess that is where im confused when you just said that's not what you are currently saying.......I think diode would agree


if you were just sayng that diode argues like a child ....which is why you thought he was losing the argument.....despite the validity of his position....then say that.

Reread it. Nothing points to me explicitly siding with uh oh. It actually defends joe and not uh oh. And I was pretty obviously, in my opinion, defending his right to have a view on something relating to minorities and not be a white supremicist. Being that cut and dry about opposing views is nonsense and beyond childish. Children don’t have the thought process to go out of their way to ignore anything they don’t like.

Really solid post by me that I haven’t seen anyone refute yet. Just yelling nonsense on a Golden soap box made of diamonds.

[Diode]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

Really solid post by me that I haven’t seen anyone refute yet. Just yelling nonsense on a Golden soap box made of diamonds.

The cognitive dissonance is remarkable.

@veritas

[Ghost1]

uh oh/joe same thing. their views are one and the same. but word.....that was my other thought that you just meant diode was arguing like a child.......but you could see how that could be misunderstood by what you said....and also why you and diode argued about it afterwards for 2 pages lol

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Diode

The cognitive dissonance is remarkable.

@veritas

How so? Please give examples

If you’re confused by that request like you have been with everything anyone has said to you, I am asking you to provide evidence of your claims. Evidence is something you use to support your opinions and arguments.

I can get some some definitions if you need. As Mr Internet, I am great with googling.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

uh oh/joe same thing. their views are one and the same. but word.....that was my other thought that you just meant diode was arguing like a child.......but you could see how that could be misunderstood by what you said....and also why you and diode argued about it afterwards for 2 pages lol

I was pretty clear after too. Brought up political correctness obviously going against his need to censor anything he finds offensive. He dismissed it. I did 2 pages of throwing peebles at an angry dog trying to make it stop barking. There were no arguments, since diode had none.

[Diode]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

How so? Please give examples

If you’re confused by that request like you have been with everything anyone has said to you, I am asking you to provide evidence of your claims. Evidence is something you use to support your opinions and arguments.

I can get some some definitions if you need. As Mr Internet, I am great with googling.

I'm not debating with a child.

But I will clue you in - you go on a rant about how nobody can refute you and you're superior while at the same time calling me out for my ivory tower elitism.

PRETTY GOOD JOKE.

Anyway, I'm done with you, so please enjoy the next few posts of Bags exposing you.

[Ghost1]

lol I was just trying to get clarification.


what is your position on what kanye said knuck?

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Diode

I'm not debating with a child.

But I will clue you in - you go on a rant about how nobody can refute you and you're superior while at the same time calling me out for my ivory tower elitism.

PRETTY GOOD JOKE.

Anyway, I'm done with you, so please enjoy the next few posts of Bags exposing you.

Where did I say no one can refute me? You didn’t try to! Lmao come on man.

I actually didn’t really say much to refute, I was just trying to get you to back up your arugemnrt against uh oh or joe so they could have a fair rebuttal back. Bags doesn’t seem to be trying to attack me. Definitely it exposing anything? I think you need an internet break.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

lol I was just trying to get clarification.


what is your position on what kanye said knuck?

Honestly man, I really dislike the guy lol. So I haven’t looked to deep into it. Can’t get myself to waste the time watching him rant at tmz. Sounds painful.

Overall I guess my position is he has the right to say what he wants, and he has the responsibility to deal with the consequences of his words. If he starts losing sponsors/business deals or something I might look more into it. He did what he wanted though. Which is to get hype around some new hot booty juice music.