Boycotting Kanye (All the black users should agree)

[Ghost1]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

Also uh oh beats diode currently in their back and forth. You can’t call for inclusion and then call someone a white supremacist over a nitpicked exaggeration. He obviously meant what uh oh said, and means that they aren’t disadvantaged any further.

Can you back your views up with facts? Or are you trolling?

I wrote an academic paper on political correctness recently and learned a lot, you should analyze how the movement contradicts itself and hurts people more than it helps in its current form.

was this scheinberg?

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

was this scheinberg?

Seems you made one area big and another bold

Which are you referring to? If the bolded bit, clarify

[Ghost1]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

Seems you made one area big and another bold

Which are you referring to? If the bolded bit, clarify

the first part indicating you thought that diode was losing the argument...the 2nd part explaining uh ohs side of the argument....the 3rd part advising diode to research information supporting uh ohs argument, seemed to me to say that you pretty clearly agreed with uh oh............and uh is clearly saying that there is no longer an excuse for black poverty and that they are responsible for their own low class status.........which is exactly what diode is saying that you said.

so I guess that is where im confused when you just said that's not what you are currently saying.......I think diode would agree


if you were just sayng that diode argues like a child ....which is why you thought he was losing the argument.....despite the validity of his position....then say that.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

the first part indicating you thought that diode was losing the argument...the 2nd part explaining uh ohs side of the argument....the 3rd part advising diode to research information supporting uh ohs argument, seemed to me to say that you pretty clearly agreed with uh oh............and uh is clearly saying that there is no longer an excuse for black poverty and that they are responsible for their own low class status.........which is exactly what diode is saying that you said.

so I guess that is where im confused when you just said that's not what you are currently saying.......I think diode would agree


if you were just sayng that diode argues like a child ....which is why you thought he was losing the argument.....despite the validity of his position....then say that.

Reread it. Nothing points to me explicitly siding with uh oh. It actually defends joe and not uh oh. And I was pretty obviously, in my opinion, defending his right to have a view on something relating to minorities and not be a white supremicist. Being that cut and dry about opposing views is nonsense and beyond childish. Children don’t have the thought process to go out of their way to ignore anything they don’t like.

Really solid post by me that I haven’t seen anyone refute yet. Just yelling nonsense on a Golden soap box made of diamonds.

[Diode]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

Really solid post by me that I haven’t seen anyone refute yet. Just yelling nonsense on a Golden soap box made of diamonds.

The cognitive dissonance is remarkable.

@veritas

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Diode

The cognitive dissonance is remarkable.

@veritas

How so? Please give examples

If you’re confused by that request like you have been with everything anyone has said to you, I am asking you to provide evidence of your claims. Evidence is something you use to support your opinions and arguments.

I can get some some definitions if you need. As Mr Internet, I am great with googling.

[Diode]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

How so? Please give examples

If you’re confused by that request like you have been with everything anyone has said to you, I am asking you to provide evidence of your claims. Evidence is something you use to support your opinions and arguments.

I can get some some definitions if you need. As Mr Internet, I am great with googling.

I'm not debating with a child.

But I will clue you in - you go on a rant about how nobody can refute you and you're superior while at the same time calling me out for my ivory tower elitism.

PRETTY GOOD JOKE.

Anyway, I'm done with you, so please enjoy the next few posts of Bags exposing you.

[uh-oh]

hey watsup guys. i see things have spiraled a bit since i was bored posting on my lunch break.

Originally Posted by Ghost1

seemed to me to say that you pretty clearly agreed with uh oh............and uh is clearly saying that there is no longer an excuse for black poverty and that they are responsible for their own low class status.........which is exactly what diode is saying that you said.

im not saying that at all, i don't think metts is saying that either. thats the problem with this whole discussion, is its all or nothing.

im assuming that diode and booth are coming from the vantage point of blacks are helpless victims, the same way they are assuming that i think they have 0 obstacles out of poverty.

both sides are much more to the center of those extremes, its just where you lean. metts probably leans a little more to the right than me but im leaning that way as well.

i think the narrative of black people in 2018 being victims, that the deck is completely stacked against them, hurts them more than helps them. there is absolutely opportunity (again in saying that i guess i have to say not as much opportunity as the average white person, even though i figured its implied but i guess not), and a whole lot less of it in generationally run democratic shitholes like detroit/philly/baltimore though because there are too many people for the opportunities that are there, and the systematic roadblocks from the past contributed to the situation now. in regards to where black people could actually move in and etc.

Originally Posted by boof

and it is not a coincidence that the people that disagree usually live the type of life uh-oh lives(staying in one concentrated area, no extended experiences trying to understand minority perspectives). a lot of it is socioeconomic, which if you remove empathy and understanding you can attempt to blame on individuals, which is what apparently gets uh-oh's dick hard at all times.

and this line of thinking is just nonsense. that might apply to your buddies back home, i don't know what madison is like, but to pretend i've lived a sheltered upbringing not exposed to minorities is a ridiculous reach to try and make sense of someone with a differing viewpoint

if anything me an metts are much closer to the actual people you guys want to label victims. i hate having to say it because it makes me feel like a fucking nerd on some "i have black friends" tip but i mean cmonson. i grew up in the hell holes and went to the black schools and all that shit. ive only recently got myself out of it and into that actual suburb life. everyone i've been around my entire life are these minorities i apparently don't know about.

again the whole thing spirals out of control because we argue in absolutes

i've stated before in these threads that the average black person doesn't have it as easy as the average white person, and all i ever say is to pretend that they are helpless victims is a giant disservice to themselves, espescially when they regurgitate those talking points as the reason they are downtrodden. its an excuse to be a victim.

its harder for a fat guy to climb a rope, but to pretend that he can't work to get himself in a position to climb it, is retarded. its also retarded to pretend there is a simple answer or fix. but telling him its the ropes fault helps no one. them skinny fuckers just shimmy up the rope.