![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 352
Battle Record: 3-6
Rep Power: 1313635 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
By the way...
A Portuguese court just ruled the PCR test is INEFFECTIVE IN DETECTING COVID and likely has around a 97% false positive rate. Look it up yourself. It’s what I’ve been saying. The recommended cycle threshold for the PCR test is way too high, resulting in viruses being detected that aren’t covid. Hence, the high case numbers. Also why most people who are dying already got issues or are old as shit. Because most people aren’t catching covid, they are catching the flu. Why else would the flu numbers be so significantly low this year compared to others? Why are the “all cause mortality” numbers relatively the same this year compared to years past, globally and in the US? All you gotta do is research how the PCR test works to connect the dots. The creator of he test himself said it’s not meant to be used for virus detection and identification. And if you refute this without knowing how a PCR test works, you’re just showing how stupid you are, and arguing with the very science you claim to trust Last edited by Coop; 01-14-2021 at 11:09 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 972
Battle Record: 14-24
Rep Power: 32898726 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
If you understood how PCR tests work you would both know that this sentence is nonsense (pending your evidenciary support) and that this fact was made clear in the article I posted.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 352
Battle Record: 3-6
Rep Power: 1313635 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
So you are refuting that specific sentence, not my point, which is “the high cycle thresholds are causing high numbers of false positives”? Oh btw... Here’s the creator of the test himself, literally explaining “you can find almost anything in anybody” Watch the whole thing, it’s short, but he puts in in layman’s terms for you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXm9kAhNj-4 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 352
Battle Record: 3-6
Rep Power: 1313635 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Stop letting media control what you think.
You are allowed to question things without fear of being ostracized. You are allowed to look up information you don’t understand. Here’s a little research roadmap for the fake smart people like fraze, or the people that want to know more about what’s going on and why: 1) Look up Kary Mullis (died last year), the guy WHO CREATED IT, and listen to his opinion on the test’s application for detecting viruses. (Again, find the ACTUAL VIDEO, not an article discussing the video. That’s a trick I keep seeing people fall for.) ****just posted it for you 2) When researching the test and how it works, don’t skip over the part about cycles and cycle thresholds. It’s the very key to this whole thing 3) look up WHO’s recommended cycle threshold for covid testing, and compare that to what you just learned 4) look up the ruling a Portuguese court just made about the effi***y of the PCR test. Spoiler: THEY RULED IT WAS UNRELIABLE FOR DETECTING COVID WITH ~97% FALSE POSITIVE RATE (!!!) 5) once you’ve done all that, now look up all the experts worldwide saying the same about these PCR tests. And try to find those same doctors being covered by the main news stations. Hmmm 6) look up the cdcs definition of how they classify a death a covid death, and if they allow only confirmed cases, or confirmed AND PROBABLE cases, based off symptoms. And look up how much a hospital gets paid through Medicare for each code and how that works 7) spend some time looking for a scientific study that conclusively proves we can transfer covid asymptomatially. Then try to find studies that suggest we can’t. 8) look up the “all cause mortality” numbers and compare 2020 to previous years, globally and US. Notice how little difference there is. Why isnt there excess death, when we are dealing with the “worst pandemic ever” and 4K dying a day. And why are flu numbers down significantly this year? Could we be misattributing the flu as covid in some cases? 9) look up the psychological effects of wearing a mask in public. If you walk around in a society of masks, it makes everyone believe that there’s something scary out there. Look up being unable to read human expression, and isolating people and making them think they are a danger to loved ones, and how that relates to torture techniques This just tip of the iceberg shit but I hope it provides some enlightenment in your life |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,956
Battle Record: 6 - 14
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Dude I somewhat agree with you when you say to be cautious of this vaccine. But then you take it up another level into the anti-masker zone. Ridiculous. There IS something scary out there, COVID, as 400k Americans are dead. The mask is the simplest most effective way on cutting down the spread. You can't whine about it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 352
Battle Record: 3-6
Rep Power: 1313635 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
The “scary” comment should be taken as “everyone wearing a mask, even when healthy, makes people think that everyone else is infected/someone wrong with them, encouraging less human interaction” ... which leads to the aforementioned psychological problems over an extended period of time |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|