PLAYOFFS DISCUSSION

[Barcotic]

Originally Posted by Victor.

@Barcotic can u explain the second punch in ur sig pls

I can best explain w/ a picture
Gimme a min.

[Victor.]

Originally Posted by Barcotic

I can best explain w/ a picture
Gimme a min.

You do realize if I need to google it , then it sucks right ?

[dull boy]

Originally Posted by Victor.

You do realize if I need to google it , then it sucks right ?

This is inaccurate and a common fallacy that needs correcting. There is a line you can cross of being overly complex and lose the audience, but writing to the lowest common denominator would be an unfortunate habit to fall into.

[Victor.]

Originally Posted by dull boy

This is inaccurate and a common fallacy that needs correcting. There is a line you can cross of being overly complex and lose the audience, but writing to the lowest common denominator would be an unfortunate habit to fall into.

That was well said . And I agree . But you can’t blame a person for not being into the same niche interests the author of the punchline was into .

[Barcotic]

Originally Posted by Victor.

You do realize if I need to google it , then it sucks right ?

However inaccurate this statement may be to begin with, it's myyy goddamn bar. I don't have to google it, I get it & I think it's dope. It's not for a battle either, so you realize your mma ignorant opinion isn't warranted nor does it matter right?

[Victor.]

Originally Posted by Barcotic

However inaccurate this statement may be to begin with, it's myyy goddamn bar. I don't have to google it, I get it & I think it's dope. It's not for a battle either, so you realize your mma ignorant opinion isn't warranted nor does it matter right?

Awesome
Never forget U have never bested me in this txt journey u take so deeply to the soul


Not once ever
In a decade
Nary a win



Keep writing those fire punchlines for internet signatures tho