Netcees  

Go Back   Netcees > Forum > Discussion Board
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-19-2019, 10:00 AM   #1
Amen
As-salamu alaykum!
 
Amen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 8,462
Battle Record: 19-8


Champed
- 1-2 Punch League Season 6

Rep Power: 0
Amen Amen Amen Amen Amen Amen Amen Amen Amen Amen Amen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Answer View Post
i can't imagine getting raped as a teenager, then being responsible for carrying your rapist's child 9 months, enduring the bodily changes and pain of child birth associated with having a baby, medical bills associated with having a kid, throwing away all your career and life opportunities to be a single parent, being financially responsible for their kid for 18+ years, which all in turn also dwindles your relationship opportunities to which you have to explain to potential partners why there's no father in the picture all because you're legally required to birth and raise a kid who grows up to look exactly like your rapist

literally nothing that could ever happen to you as a male would be worse than that
Um, no.

Adoption is always an option. There are plenty of people who can not have children and much rather take a newborn over a toddler. And only idiots throw away their careers and life opportunities. You obviously don’t have any children. Children don’t affect relationships much either. Only immature faggots hold that against the female or male.
Amen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2019, 11:00 AM   #2
Answer
He / Him / His
 
Answer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,701
Battle Record: 20-1


Champed
- Summer Classic IX
- Netcees Battle League
- Fight night 15

Rep Power: 14633673
Answer has a brilliant futureAnswer has a brilliant futureAnswer has a brilliant futureAnswer has a brilliant futureAnswer has a brilliant futureAnswer has a brilliant futureAnswer has a brilliant futureAnswer has a brilliant futureAnswer has a brilliant futureAnswer has a brilliant futureAnswer has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amen View Post
Um, no.

Adoption is always an option. There are plenty of people who can not have children and much rather take a newborn over a toddler.

1) The woman still has bodily changes that are irreversible, 9 months of carrying a child in a public setting e.g. work and everyone knowing that you're pregnant and asking "i thought you were pregnant, how is your baby?". It's also not about whether or not men hold those bodily changes against them, it's the fact that women have to endure it themselves

2) It still costs thousands of dollars in medical bills in a health system that is increasingly upcharging patients

3) I would imagine there's also an incredibly complex psychological dispute for any woman who has to make the decision to either give the baby up or keep it. Neither choice is objectively the right one.

4) There are already kids who go their lives without finding homes through fostering or adoption. Restricting abortion will only increase that number substantially. The fact is that there are a lot of people (not all) who just have more interest in raising their own DNA than trying to adopt. The entire adoption process in itself also had a lot of issues that should be worked on, but that's a completely different topic.
Answer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bleak gives head to vets, witty is a rapist


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Google+