Adrenochrome

[Ghost1]

so...as an objective viewer in this ongoing debate....here are the flaws in your formula...y=the elite are sacrificing children..........you are offering this as a concrete definition in your formula that everyone would agree on.......but you've leapt to this definition without making sure firstly that everyone actually agrees on it....as it appears they do not.....so before you can offer that as a part of your formula you need to prove it to be true in order to have it accepted as part of your equation

if you can accomplish this.....x being that kids are being kidnapped in mass numbers....plus y being that the elite ritually sacrifice children....does not equal Z...z should be your interpretation of x+y ...as it stands you listed another component to your formula....where x+y+z = zz is a more apt formula for the function youre attempting to propose.

the leaps from x to y to z to zz however are hugely presumptuous and make it very difficult to confidently arrive at zz

diode and dullboy have also posed logical arguments that state that adrenochrome is a fictional drug originating from popular writing and also that the effects youre attributing to the drug...regardless of its name....are inaccurate as well

so.......u cant just say DOES IT NOT MAKE SENSE MAYBE IT COULD POSSIBLY HAPPEN EVER SOMETIME ONCE IN EXISTENCE....obviously that's an exaggeration but the burden of proof lies with you for a few points

1. elites are ritually sacrificing/torturing children
2. adrenochrome is not a fictional drug created by the author of fear and loathing
3. the effects of the drug in question (regardless of its actual name) are what youre purporting them to be

personally I would need to see references to peer reviewed academic medical journals

the idea that those sources are less reliable than more popular sensational sources that this type of information may have originated from is another case you would need to justify to me.... and u would need to do it without asking ....is it possible....that's not good enough....it should be is it probable.

[veritas]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

so...as an objective viewer in this ongoing debate....here are the flaws in your formula...y=the elite are sacrificing children..........you are offering this as a concrete definition in your formula that everyone would agree on.......but you've leapt to this definition without making sure firstly that everyone actually agrees on it....as it appears they do not.....so before you can offer that as a part of your formula you need to prove it to be true in order to have it accepted as part of your equation

if you can accomplish this.....x being that kids are being kidnapped in mass numbers....plus y being that the elite ritually sacrifice children....does not equal Z...z should be your interpretation of x+y ...as it stands you listed another component to your formula....where x+y+z = zz is a more apt formula for the function youre attempting to propose.

the leaps from x to y to z to zz however are hugely presumptuous and make it very difficult to confidently arrive at zz

diode and dullboy have also posed logical arguments that state that adrenochrome is a fictional drug originating from popular writing and also that the effects youre attributing to the drug...regardless of its name....are inaccurate as well

so.......u cant just say DOES IT NOT MAKE SENSE MAYBE IT COULD POSSIBLY HAPPEN EVER SOMETIME ONCE IN EXISTENCE....obviously that's an exaggeration but the burden of proof lies with you for a few points

1. elites are ritually sacrificing/torturing children
2. adrenochrome is not a fictional drug created by the author of fear and loathing
3. the effects of the drug in question (regardless of its actual name) are what youre purporting them to be

personally I would need to see references to peer reviewed academic medical journals

the idea that those sources are less reliable than more popular sensational sources that this type of information may have originated from is another case you would need to justify to me.... and u would need to do it without asking ....is it possible....that's not good enough....it should be is it probable.

This may be your best post ever. Yes I agree that my formula was not excellent. As I told Dre. I was in a rush, and I apologize.

I can give you no peer-reviewed scientific journals. I can only give you thoughts, and examples, and maybe some statistics. I can give you a punch of puzzle pieces, but no edge pieces, and ask you if you can see the forest from the trees.

I legitimate found this topic to be fascinating. Where the turn came in, was how members of the board immediately just dismissed it as an impossibility. I understand that the burden of proof lies in my court, and I am willing to do so.

would you allow my presentation of crumbs and puzzle pieces as evidence for your mind?

[Ghost1]

Originally Posted by veritas

This may be your best post ever. Yes I agree that my formula was not excellent. As I told Dre. I was in a rush, and I apologize.

I can give you no peer-reviewed scientific journals. I can only give you thoughts, and examples, and maybe some statistics. I can give you a punch of puzzle pieces, but no edge pieces, and ask you if you can see the forest from the trees.

I legitimate found this topic to be fascinating. Where the turn came in, was how members of the board immediately just dismissed it as an impossibility. I understand that the burden of proof lies in my court, and I am willing to do so.

would you allow my presentation of crumbs and puzzle pieces as evidence for your mind?

yes I would be interested but firstly those 3 questions I mentioned should be addressed and when addressing them it will be important what sources you are drawing from if they are not academic journals. This is crucial to your argument because it lays the foundation for the resulting claims you present.

[veritas]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

yes I would be interested but firstly those 3 questions I mentioned should be addressed and when addressing them it will be important what sources you are drawing from if they are not academic journals. This is crucial to your argument because it lays the foundation for the resulting claims you present.

yes. remember I am only theorizing. not making definitive claims.