things that interest you that others dont care about probably thread

[veritas]

Because of what they represented. You err in the scriptures.

Also....think about this: why did the Jew cucks not try to produce a body. All they us to do was produce a body and poof! Rebellion leader is just a man. Rebellion over. No prophesied King to save you!

Fair?

[uh-oh]

Originally Posted by veritas

Because of what they represented. You err in the scriptures.

Also....think about this: why did the Jew cucks not try to produce a body. All they us to do was produce a body and poof! Rebellion leader is just a man. Rebellion over. No prophesied King to save you!

Fair?

i don't understand your narrative for rebellion, we already established that if jesus was an actual human being, even a human being that was god manifested in the flesh, his rebellion never happened. it was squashed before it started. the subsequent rebellions occurred generations after his alleged death and had nothing to do with him so producing his body makes no sense. it was my hypothesis that later christians created jesus and modeled him after an amalgamation of all the uprisings and rebellions. not that those uprisings were ABOUT jesus.

you seem to bring this to god, which is fine. im not arguing against your belief in nonsense. have at it. im simply debating the historical likelihood of a human being named jesus christ.

[veritas]

Originally Posted by uh-oh

i don't understand your narrative for rebellion, we already established that if jesus was an actual human being, even a human being that was god manifested in the flesh, his rebellion never happened. it was squashed before it started. the subsequent rebellions occurred generations after his alleged death and had nothing to do with him so producing his body makes no sense. it was my hypothesis that later christians created jesus and modeled him after an amalgamation of all the uprisings and rebellions. not that those uprisings were ABOUT jesus.

you seem to bring this to god, which is fine. im not arguing against your belief in nonsense. have at it. im simply debating the historical likelihood of a human being named jesus christ.

You helped me make another point actually. The first is that you still don’t understand what I meant about him choosing to not rebel *to help make your point!*

Now the new point that his rebellion was very successful. Do you see how?