Clinton vs Trump, who would you vote for if it comes down to this?

veritas · 08-13-2016, 06:41 PM

soooooo....

yes or no: we have agreed that she is of dishonest character?

nextly:

If i had three close business associates die shortly after I made alot of money with their help...all in strange "accidents" would that be suspicious? yes or no.

Witty · 08-13-2016, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veritas

soooooo....

yes or no: we have agreed that she is of dishonest character?

nextly:

If i had three close business associates die shortly after I made alot of money with their help...all in strange "accidents" would that be suspicious? yes or no.

Yes we have agreed that.

A lot of those were not accidents tho, the first guy died of a heart attack. But even so, something can seem suspicious to people without it actually being true, that's called a rumour...something that sounds viable to certain people but has never been proven. I don't deal in rumours.

veritas · 08-13-2016, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Witty

Yes we have agreed that.

A lot of those were not accidents tho, the first guy died of a heart attack. But even so, something can seem suspicious to people without it actually being true, that's called a rumour...something that sounds viable to certain people but has never been proven. I don't deal in rumours.

so...to you if i had 3 business partners who died of accidents after i made profit that would NOT be suspicious to you?

Witty · 08-13-2016, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veritas

so...to you if i had 3 business partners who died of accidents after i made profit that would NOT be suspicious to you?

I kinda take life as it comes, so if three people die that I know, that's just a shitty week.

veritas · 08-13-2016, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Witty

I kinda take life as it comes, so if three people die that I know, that's just a shitty week.

OK so if 3 people who were connected to her business dealings died mysterious deaths after she made a profit you would not find that suspicious then correct?

Blanco Bishop · 08-14-2016, 03:22 AM

G Johnson is a weak libertarian.
Won't even attack Hillary outright.
Y'all Hillary supporters are in denial.
The Benghazi incident is proof enough.
That embassy asked for more protection.
She refused.
Americans get hacked.
Blood on her hands.
We are all collateral to her.
Y'all are fuckin stupid.

Certain · 08-14-2016, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blanco Bishop

G Johnson is a weak libertarian.
Won't even attack Hillary outright.
Y'all Hillary supporters are in denial.
The Benghazi incident is proof enough.
That embassy asked for more protection.
She refused.
Americans get hacked.
Blood on her hands.
We are all collateral to her.
Y'all are fuckin stupid.

Let's say everything else you said is correct. She still is a better option than Donald Trump. That's enough.

08-14-2016, 03:22 AM	#6
Blanco Bishop Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Cali Posts: 1,460 Battle Record: 11-20 Rep Power: 4150485	G Johnson is a weak libertarian. Won't even attack Hillary outright. Y'all Hillary supporters are in denial. The Benghazi incident is proof enough. That embassy asked for more protection. She refused. Americans get hacked. Blood on her hands. We are all collateral to her. Y'all are fuckin stupid.