The New World Order/September 11th Research Thread, Part 2

[Vulgar]

@Nigma

I'll spend some time to go more in-depth in the future, however in the meantime I encourage you to do some research about the Bildeberg group, CFR, and Skull and Bones society in particular because those three organizations essentially dictate what goes on in the world.

I've done a decent share of research on each. In Bilderberg's case, I only did what was possible since there's never really anything you can gather on it other than it's completely secret. The CFR I disagree with. They make "useful recommendations" as some would say but I wouldn't consider them the MAIN think tank running the show. There are many others hogging that spotlight behind the scenes. Skull and Bones? Ehhh. I think we both know you don't have any proof that a university fraternity has any global power in their hands. Do powerful people rise through the ranks of that fraternity? Yes, but to state that they currently hold influence over the globe is nonsense.

The CFR, for example, hold closed door meetings, the topics of which do not leave the ears of it's members.

Isn't there a website where they post all of their publications as well as a 'Foreign Policy' magazine where they publish articles on the world? They may have closed door meetings, true, but doesn't every corporate meeting or group of powerful business men do the same thing? I mean, teachers at elementary schools have closed door meetings with eachother. The question is, ho do you prove that what goes on in those CFR meetings is insidious?

The rest of what you said I have no qualms with. Pardon my skepticism - this is your proper initiation :) I'm just seeing how much you know, or think you know. Post some cool stuff about the World Bank if you're interested. How did you become educated about it? This thread is meant for links and research.

[Chyeahhh!!!]

I am nolonger worthy

[Nigma]

Interesting video I just watched, microcosm of American economics. Will be clarifying my previous posts in the near future.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=4949289128018

[Vulgar]

^I think I saw that video on youtube. Is that where the little girl is on TV with her mother showing off her knowledge?

[Vulgar]

Syria Teeters on Obama’s “Red Line”by NILE BOWIE


The pages of history tell us that beautiful civilizations emerged and prospered in the ancient cities of Damascus and Aleppo, some of the oldest continually inhabited cities on earth. The harrowing circus of brutality that is the Syrian conflict, now in its third year, will soil and blacken those pages indefinitely. No matter the political outcome of this horrible war, a once tolerant and diverse state has been shattered and terror itself has eaten into the destiny of Syria’s people, inexorably changing the courses of their lives forever. Children have been orphaned; parents have faced the loss of their children – and by uncompromising means. Infants have been beheaded, the fates of innocent men and women have been sealed through summary executions, and families have been torn apart or destroyed all together. Recent developments in Syria are alarming.

Spokesmen of the Assad government recently accused foreign-backed militants of launching scud missiles containing chemical weapons in the city of Aleppo, killing dozens. Witnesses claim to have seen powder emanate from the rocket, causing those who inhaled the substance to suffocate or require immediate medical attention. An unnamed chemical weapons expert cited by Al-Jazeera claimed that the causalities were not consistent with Syria’s reputed stockpile of chemical agents, stating, “If it’s a chemical warfare agent, it’s not working very well.” Syria’s ambassador to the UN, Bashar Ja’afari, called on the UN Secretary-General to form an independent technical mission to investigate the use of chemical weapons by terrorist groups operating in Syria.


While on his first state visit to Israel, Barack Obama cast doubt and expressed deep scepticism toward the Assad government’s version of events, stating that if the government did indeed use chemical weapons, then it meant a “red line” had been crossed. Obama vowed not to make further announcements until concrete facts were established. What this essentially means is that Obama is now in a position to act on his statements and intervene more boldly and directly than the United States has already been doing since the beginning of the conflict. Additionally, NATO personnel have also indicated that they are prepared to employ a wide range of operations. US-European Command Admiral James Stavridis recently told media that the alliance was “prepared, if called upon, to be engaged as we were in Libya.”

Those who have critically monitored the situation from the beginning are under no illusions. The way in which mainstream media sources have covered the Syrian conflict, perhaps more so than any other topic in recent times, shows unequivocally how certain content providers have moved in step with the foreign policy of the Western and Gulf states who have enabled insurgent groups and provided diplomatic cover for opposition politicians who represent their economic and strategic interests. The Obama administration’s policy toward Libya and Syria eyes the same familiar endgame as what the Bush administration sought in its foreign policy adventures. The fact that many of those on the left who campaigned against Iraq and Afghanistan are now generally silent, or even supportive of Obama’s agenda, is proof that his policies have been packaged far more intelligently for mainstream consumption. The reality is that Syria is “Shock and Awe” by other means.

There are a myriad of reasons why Bashar al-Assad must go in the eyes of policy makers in Washington and Tel Aviv, and the destruction of his tenure could not have been possible without the financial muscle of Saudi Arabia and Qatar’s wretchedly opulent Sunni Monarchs. These glittering kingdoms of disaster-capitalism are not only responsible for supplying weapons and cash; a major incentive of theirs is exporting the Wahhabist and Salafist ideologies that many of Syria’s imported jihadists subscribe to, a warped and primal interpretation of Islam that has fueled the sectarian nature of the Syrian conflict and deepened social divisions to their most dangerous point – in a country that was once renowned for its tolerance of religious diversity. These Gulf kingdoms, which are more-or-less given a trump card to commit deplorable human rights violations institutionally, are also responsible for propping up the political arm of their militant foot soldiers, and that comes in the form of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Syria’s opposition coalition, which is itself entirely a creation of foreign powers, has recently elected its own interim prime minister – enter, Ghassan Hitto, a virtually unknown political novice with a US passport and a computer science degree from Purdue University. Hitto is an Islamist Kurd with strong ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood has politically dominated the Syrian National Council since its creation, in addition to organizing tactical elements of the insurgency. The backbone of the Brotherhood’s relationship with the medieval monarchies of the Persian Gulf is grounded in a firm opposition to Shi’a Islam, as extolled by clerical leaders in Iran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah; Assad himself is also an Alawite, an offshoot of Shi’a Islam. It should be clear enough by now how enflaming sectarian divisions in the region was a prerequisite for those bank-rolling the insurgency, aimed at demolishing the secular Syrian state.

Several high-profile members of Syria’s opposition coalition boycotted the vote for interim prime minister, citing what they viewed as a foreign-backed campaign to elect Hitto. Kamal Labwani, a veteran opposition campaigner, was reported as saying, “We don’t want what happened in Egypt to happen in Syria. They hijacked the revolution.” Those who abstained from the vote accuse Hitto of being a puppet of the Muslim Brotherhood, and that the SNC’s decisions were being dictated from the outside. Walid al-Bunni, another senior figure in the opposition, stated, “The Muslim Brotherhood, with the backing of Qatar, have imposed their prime minister candidate. We will keep away if the coalition does not reconsider its choice.” Let’s just get this straight – Assad, a leader whose presence today is a testament to the fact that he continues to enjoy majority popular support, is considered to have lost his legitimacy. On the other hand, Hitto, a man with no political experience who received 35 votes out of 49 ballots cast during a Syrian National Coalition meeting, is supposed to be legitimate representative of the Syrian people?


These realities can only be interpreted as the boot of the so-called “International Community” squashing the face of the Syrian people, imposing on them a man who does not represent them, but the business interests of multinational corporations who seek to plant their flags in the soil of a post-Assad Syria. Let’s not humor ourselves by thinking John Kerry, William Hague, Laurent Fabius or Qatari Emir Khalifa Al Thani actually care about the people of Syria. However many casualties the Syrian conflict has incurred thus far can be attributable to the influx of foreign funds, foreign arms, and foreign fighters. It would be intellectually dishonest to deny that the tactics of Bashar al-Assad and the Syrian Arab Army have also caused widespread civilian causalities and suffering. It is an enormous challenge for a state military to quell unconventional insurgencies of the sort carried out by militants in Syria when these battles take place in densely populated residential areas.

One should not cynically credit Syrian government forces with intentionally killing their own people; this does not serve the purposes of the state in anyway. Civilian deaths that have occurred as a result of government forces engaging the insurgency should more accurately be seen as a heinous by-product of a foreign campaign to topple the Syrian government. While the foreign ministries of Western capitals cite politically charged death-toll statistics to justify their campaign against “Assad the Butcher”, it is absolutely unconscionable that Paris and London have called for lifting the Syrian arms embargo, and for vowing to arm militant groups with or without the consent of the EU. Apparently some seventy thousand people have been killed in Syria according to the United Nations, and these cited European states, which allegedly are so concerned about terrorism, want to dump more guns into Syria – this is madness.

Western states want to install proxy leaders who will grovel to their multinationals and swallow IMF medicine, Gulf states seek unfettered hegemony in their own backyards, and they all want to see the Shi’a resistance smashed to pieces. Following the news of chemical weapons being used in Syria, the most immediate conclusion of this observer is that foreign-backed militants, who have used every opportunity to call for more material and support, employed the use of a smuggled chemical weapon of poor quality to bring about direct military intervention in their favor. Right on cue, Senators Lindsey Graham and John McCain are frothing at the mouth, urging President Obama to “take immediate action” and consider deploying troops. Graham was quoted as saying, “If the choice is to send in troops to secure the weapons sites versus allowing chemical weapons to get in the hands of some of the most violent people in the world, I vote to cut this off before it becomes a problem.”

There is no surer sign of a pathological mind than when one credits others with the blood on their own hands.

Nile Bowie is an independent political analyst and photographer based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. He can be reached at nilebowie@gmail.com

Decent article.

[zygote]

It was a catalyst for mortality salience and provided a casus belli.
Link between the two - http://www.sozialpsychologie.uni-fra...t-al.-1998.pdf
Also, cannot find evidence to support this hunch, but there may be a positive correlation between mortality salience and consumerism. If yes, then it supported both war and economy. What are your opinions on all the "threat-level porn" spread by media outlets?

[NYCSPITZ]

8===========>~~~~~~~~~~~

[Vulgar]

Recent articles I've spotted thanks to Cryptogon.com News (amazing website, all should check it out)


MUST SEE: http://drones.pitchinteractive.com/

According to five people familiar with the call, Brennan stressed that the plot was never a threat to the U.S. public or air safety because Washington had “inside control” over it.

Brennan’s comment appears unintentionally to have helped lead to disclosure of the secret at the heart of a joint U.S.-British-Saudi undercover counter-terrorism operation.

The Atlantic: "Latest Underwear Bomber Was Actually CIA Spy"
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/natio...cia-spy/52080/

The Atlantic: "Tracing the CIA Underwear Bomb Leak Back to the White House"
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/natio...e-house/52537/



Pitch Interactive, a Berkeley-based data visualization unit, has created a graphic tracking every drone strike the United States has carried out in Pakistan since 2004.

The visualization, seen below, tracks the victims of the strikes using data from the Bureau for Investigative Journalism, specifically noting children and civilian collateral damage. Note the sharp uptick after President Obama takes office in 2009…


lol

[Nigma]

Nice bump Vulgar, I have a page of notes I'll type into paragraphs one of these days.

[Just C]

coulda swore i just stepped into 2003

[Just C]

Originally Posted by 2 Beautiful

This is getting old.

damn even dg knows this is tired as fuck

[Vulgar]

The new world order is "so 2003"? Thanks for showing us all you have learned nothing in your bubble.

[veritas]

I have recently discovered this is all a ruse---

@merica is a fiction

[Vulgar]

Can you elaborate on your discovery?

[veritas]

Economy is a lie. There is no profit merely the re assigning of debt....

We are commerce tried under admiralty although on land the ucc,

Politics and the economy is a lie

[veritas]

The fed bought america in 1933.

Republic democrat is irrelevant

[Vulgar]

Originally Posted by c.d.m.

Economy is a lie. There is no profit merely the re assigning of debt....

We are commerce tried under admiralty although on land the ucc,

Politics and the economy is a lie

Don't understand these terms, can you expand?

[Vulgar]

By the way, I'm going to be writing an article on my findings throughout the Trilateral Commission's "Trialogue" series which chronicles every single meeting that they had with written texts of every speech. It's all on the website for free reading access lol. I've found some gems so far but can't copy and paste due to their PDF file format. I'll have to go back over and type up whatever exerpts I want to cite. I think the Trilateral Commission is overblown in its importance and power, but not entirely misunderstood. Some are good articles, though many are misleading.

[Just C]

Originally Posted by Vulgar

The new world order is "so 2003"?

No, where did I say that? do you mean to say that I have to spell out for you which topic I was referring to as "extremely played, tired/clichéd" ? If so, god help you in your search for the truth because you're none to bright Mr Conspiracy

[Vulgar]

@Chyeahhh!!!

Did you know that Kykuit has an underground bunker? lol

also,

"John D. Rockefeller, Jr.
"I Believe"

On July 8, 1941, in a radio broadcast appeal on behalf of the United Service Organizations and the National War Fund, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. read this statement of principles that was widely reprinted under the title, "I Believe."

Click on the image to view and read from the original speech or read a transcript of the entire speech


I Believe

I believe in the supreme worth of the individual and in his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

I believe that every right implies a responsibility; every opportunity, an obligation; every possession, a duty.

I believe that the law was made for man and not man for the law; that government is the servant of the people and not their master.

I believe in the dignity of labor, whether with head or hand; that the world owes no man a living but that it owes every man an opportunity to make a living.

I believe that thrift is essential to well ordered living and that economy is a prime requisite of a sound financial structure, whether in government, business or personal affairs.

I believe that truth and justice are fundamental to an enduring social order.

I believe in the sacredness of a promise, that a man's word should be as good as his bond; that character -- not wealth or power or position -- is of supreme worth.

I believe that the rendering of useful service is the common duty of mankind and that only in the purifying fire of sacrifice is the dross of selfishness consumed and the greatness of the human soul set free.

I believe in an all-wise and all-loving God, named by whatever name, and that the individual's highest fulfillment, greatest happiness, and widest usefulness are to be found in living in harmony with His will.

I believe that love is the greatest thing in the world; that it alone can overcome hate; that right can and will triumph over might."


In 1962 these words were included on a commemorative plaque that honors him at Rockefeller Center.


---

for srs?