![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
obsessed
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: fucka idiyote
Posts: 5,709
Battle Record: Faggot-1
Accomplishments - can recite entirety of shrek 2
Champed - tangoed with spider man behind scenes in spider-man 2
- was candidate for gerber baby 3x
- smush parker like bb comment on instagram saying "u fucka suck idiyote"
- smush beer on head and didn't cry
- parallel parked in between 2 ferrari's in tonky truck once
- when saying pledge of allegiance i said "i don't" lmao deadass bb satan
- won tshirt from taco bell saying "taco cat" is the same backwards for filling out 500 surveys in a
- neighbor house caught on fire i call FIRE department and saved lives, was in newspaper
- set neighbor house on fire lmao
- fuck neighbor husband and wife
- first fish caught resembled david ortiz
- colin kaepernick
- related to genghis khan
- elected assistant to the vice president assistant to the president for regional chess club
- never lost game of hide and seek
Rep Power: 8599682 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
this is tight and i see bounds of improvement...graphically. my problem (problem lol) with your writing wasnt anything to do with the tier of writing you possessed, but moreso you were more one direction if anything... its hard to debug a writer based on singular performances or anything of that matter, but with you, you demonstrated more of a metaphorical possession and you stuck to that on various levels, never really treading...for example, a writer that poses only a visual context line after line, its hard to think of anything else they write that might be exclusive or amazing in that literary element. here, you showed flashes of both metaphorical writing and imagery entailing the lexicon of weapons you have that are above average. your thematic language is good but could be better, (this is me critiquing you, not giving you positive feedback on the things you already do exceptionally, btw)
you had many flashes of deadmanesque writing here, its funny, really. the way he configures and dedicates about 4 lines to a certain imagery that develops the readers mind and the stories progression is more linear, rather than arcing, so to say, this can be in one of his verses and nobody would question it Quote:
you gave a bit of a psychosomatic philosophical query of thoughts towards the end, which didnt really flash brilliance of your ordinary stuff, but moreso the influence of a mesh of writers or you trying to deliberately wrap up the story. in the grand scheme of things this was good. entailing every detail of life together and the top tier of possible writing there is, i'd give it around a 7. your overall writing exposure i'd give it a high 8, meandering around 6-8 on a given occasion. another thing I was going to mention, your fluidity with words has, respectably improved drastically, something just showing vast amounts of improvements, this is where you turn off a lot of readers with a grasp of language and writing entirely (experienced, good writers/readers) your wording at an overall basis was about a D+ (seriously, your wording is absolutely horrid at times, to fit these complex metaphorical ideas that are, above average) combining the two makes your writing just a step below above average at times, or tad above it, hovering around there. Thats where you stand, in my opinion. When you combine a negative neutron and a positive one (this isn't really science im about to deploy) you can get either a mostly positive reaction, or a slightly negative one. You combined these two monsters and your writing lacks, but when you combine two positives, one being a bigger plus sign (your ideas, etc) with your wording (smaller plus sign) theres no doubt you'll fall in the likeness of a lot of people. this is exceptional wording and i applaud you Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|