Faggots talking shit

rothschild · 02-10-2013, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by God Of War

lmfao@anyone saying aus n u.k soldiers are any where near better then u.s soldiers

it's a fact that both the uk and aus spend more money and time training everyone, they adhere to higher standards on most things. us marines are nowhere near as well trained as royal marines, i think they have only 12 weeks of training as opposed to the 32+ weeks the royals do..etc i'm pretty sure even the regular british army have more than 12 weeks initially too.

Anjahl · 02-10-2013, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rothschild

it's a fact that both the uk and aus spend more money and time training everyone, they adhere to higher standards on most things. us marines are nowhere near as well trained as royal marines, i think they have only 12 weeks of training as opposed to the 32+ weeks the royals do..etc

1. Royal Marines are trained as a commado force. 32 Weeks is including add on training.
2. U.S. Marines do 13 weeks bootcamp, then infantry training/MCT then further training according to MOS. I went through almost 2 years of training.
3. .Compare similar forces w/similar objectives: Force Recon>Royal Marine Commandos.

There is no comparison. It also doesn't matter what the length of training is...it's quality of training, and quality of force. The U.S. Marine Corps is a superior individual force to any on the planet. That is empirical fact. Royal Marines would agree with you.

Australians? Australians fucking salute Marines.

Also, are you really gonna say that Australia and the U.K. spend more money on troops? Really? Fucking Really?

rothschild · 02-10-2013, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anjahl

1. Royal Marines are trained as a commado force. 32 Weeks is including add on training.
2. U.S. Marines do 13 weeks bootcamp, then infantry training/MCT then further training according to MOS. I went through almost 2 years of training.
3. .Compare similar forces w/similar objectives: Force Recon>Royal Marine Commandos.

There is no comparison. It also doesn't matter what the length of training is...it's quality of training, and quality of force. The U.S. Marine Corps is a superior individual force to any on the planet. That is empirical fact. Royal Marines would agree with you.

Australians? Australians fucking salute Marines.

Also, are you really gonna say that Australia and the U.K. spend more money on troops? Really? Fucking Really?

per soldier you illiterate idiot. us marines want to be royal marines, it's their dream. all us marines has is size, royal marines has the knowledge.

all american's can do is run. all my information is from an ex-royal marine who was also in the sbs. so a whole next level to you little army scrubs.

just like how red arrows is the premium stunt display team, all the american pilots rush over to get their autographs. your whole military is based on the british model and we still train your special forces.

Anjahl · 02-10-2013, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rothschild

per soldier you illiterate idiot. us marines want to be royal marines, it's their dream. all us marines has is size, royal marines has the knowledge.

all american's can do is run. all my information is from an ex-royal marine who was also in the sbs. so a whole next level to you little army scrubs.

just like how red arrows is the premium stunt display team, all the american pilots rush over to get their autographs. your whole military is based on the british model and we still train your special forces.

That's Marine with a capital M bitch.
All spec ops units train with each other.

And no, I don't know where the fuck you british fags get this from, but our Military model is not based on yours. It hasn't been since the Revolutionary War...you know, where we changed the way war is fought and beat you guys. It changed further during WWII, when we won the battle for naval supremacy, becoming the only nation left standing who has mastered carrier warfare...and it change even further during the cold war era when we pioneered maneuver warfare in order to combat overwhelming soviet armor and firepower on the European front.

To date, we are the only country capable of parallel war, hyperwar, and 4th dimensional warfare...and we can do all of them at once. Your argument is that a Military which posses capabilities far beyond anything yours has, is based on yours. I'd like to know how. That's like saying the fucking aliens in an invasion movie has based their tech on ours.

Also, you're comparing a 7500 person commando force to a 200000 person military BRANCH. It's fucking retarded. Compare unit to unit, and the USMC will shit all over Royal Marines. 6000 boots on the ground anywhere in the world in 6 hrs with full armor and air support...one unified combined arms force all directed and organized to move as a single fist-the razor sharp tip of America's military spear. THAT'S the definition of elite.

But we can continue this debate if you want.
You google from your recliner, and I'll stand by my training and military history.

God Of War · 02-10-2013, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rothschild

it's a fact that both the uk and aus spend more money and time training everyone, they adhere to higher standards on most things. us marines are nowhere near as well trained as royal marines, i think they have only 12 weeks of training as opposed to the 32+ weeks the royals do..etc i'm pretty sure even the regular british army have more than 12 weeks initially too.

really? so them countries pay our trainers to go over there and help train YOUR COUNTRIES tell me they dont i dare oyu. 2 members of my family just got back from them areas from going over there for 4 weeks to train YALLS soldiers in different areas so they can be more fucking relevant. so u still dont know shit except for what u read on a webpage bro