Imma vent rq

[DMS]

Originally Posted by Sharp

Sure, but there's also an artist's intent to consider. Art is full of people looking for the ugly, absurd, 'bad', etc in different media because it doesn't exist in a vacuum. Think Piss Christ or Kanye's 'scoop Diddy woop poop' verse. There's a different 'formula' for different context which is why you can't, in any sweeping statement, settle in a formula for art

That makes sense ig, but such a formula would be worse, which makes it better.
This formula only refers to the form and technique, the structure, I completely agree no formula can be applied to creativity. Doing ‘bad’ isn’t a form of doing ‘good’ in any context

[Sharp]

Originally Posted by DMS

That makes sense ig, but such a formula would be worse, which makes it better.

you lost me there


This formula only refers to the form and technique, the structure, I completely agree no formula can be applied to creativity. Doing ‘bad’ isn’t a form of doing ‘good’ in any context

But in any situation the artist may want to evoke different things, by which being technically perfect isn't the best option. You're talking about the technical writing side of things, which is valuable and can be well-put together, but there's also a huge piece of art that's dedicated to context (for the artist, the work, and the audience) that can really make a bar 'great'

Originally Posted by Aero

This thread would be more appropriate if I made it.

Still time

Went from coffee to wine so I'll get you to at least 100 posts

[DMS]

Originally Posted by Sharp

But in any situation the artist may want to evoke different things, by which being technically perfect isn't the best option. You're talking about the technical writing side of things, which is valuable and can be well-put together, but there's also a huge piece of art that's dedicated to context (for the artist, the work, and the audience) that can really make a bar 'great'



Still time

Went from coffee to wine so I'll get you to at least 100 posts

I’m aware I’m only looking at technique, which is what the formula is for.

[Sharp]

Originally Posted by DMS

I’m aware I’m only looking at technique, which is what the formula is for.

But your op is how to write a bar, any bar, which is a pretty flawed way to look at things

[DMS]

Originally Posted by Sharp

But your op is how to write a bar, any bar, which is a pretty flawed way to look at things

Thas true

I should have clarified, tho it does seem obv b/c of step one, that this only applies to bars with themes/concepts, in which case it can be applied to a singular bar or multiple