Question about the second amendment

[Destroyer]

Yeah thanks for weighing in trump wrecka because your opinion is worth a lot

[Mike Wrecka]

Lmao you thought that a militia and an army are the same thing. That just shows how uninformed you are. There are active militia in every state.

You also said that a militia could never actually impede an invading army. Which is completely false. It's called guerilla warfare. it worked quite well for the Vietmanese. All of our planes and bombs didn't mean shit.

And Militia turned the tide of the Revolutionary war, right on this soil , against the strongest military in the world at the time. U can't fight what u can't see


An invasion is incredibly difficult. We have a large population in this country. An invading army would have to patrol every area of every state. And we would vastly outnumber them. Now while your there holding ur latte it will be a piece of cake for a Korean to take over destroyers block but an armed militia using guerilla warfare can actually hold its own.

Now ofcourse an invasion is highly unlikely. but not out of the realm of possibility. .

[Batty]

http://www.guncite.com/gc2ndmea.html

Fighting tanks with pistols is an extreme case, but yeah, I'd rather at least try that shit then just get steamrolled and shit lol.

But yo, forreal... if some Hurricane Katrina shit happens again and in your area, you better be ready.

That's the type of shit you need your own response team for, real talk.

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by Mike Wrecka

Lmao you thought that a militia and an army are the same thing. That just shows how uninformed you are. There are active militia in every state.

You also said that a militia could never actually impede an invading army. Which is completely false. It's called guerilla warfare. it worked quite well for the Vietmanese. All of our planes and bombs didn't mean shit.

And Militia turned the tide of the Revolutionary war, right on this soil , against the strongest military in the world at the time. U can't fight what u can't see


An invasion is incredibly difficult. We have a large population in this country. An invading army would have to patrol every area of every state. And we would vastly outnumber them. Now while your there holding ur latte it will be a piece of cake for a Korean to take over destroyers block but an armed militia using guerilla warfare can actually hold its own.

Now ofcourse an invasion is highly unlikely. but not out of the realm of possibility. .

just read your last sentence to see how irrelevant your opinion is
I never said a militia was the same as the armed forces. I said at the time of the writing of the second amendment, militias were necessary, now, with the existence of the armed forces, they're unnecessary. Granted, yeah, if the Koreans invade the US land, (never happen in a million years, not just unlikely, impossible) maybe it would be nice to have an armed populace. But we already have that for other reasons. We don't need a militia. And LMAO @ "there's a militia in every state." Yeah, and they're all idiot rednecks who oppose the American govt. That's your evidence for why militias are needed for the good of the American people should a war break out on our own soil? Go jerk off to some trump YouTube vids, idiot.

[anime_boners]

Originally Posted by Witty

How does this relate to personal gun ownership?

it is a 200+ year old document created in a world entirely different than today's world.

it's had amendments added, removed, edited time and time again.

but many of our politicians are in the pocket of the NRA, and so this particular amendment is cannot be touched.


welcome to America where are on the verge of putting Donald fucking Trump in the white house.