this theory doesn't make sense in my head yet

[PancakeBrah]

i nominate namix's long post for 1)worst post of the year and 2)most amount of bullshit in one post.

[oats]

Lots of butchered science going on in this thread. But don't let that stop you, please, grab that bong and keep going.

[Chyeahhh!!!]

Originally Posted by oats

Lots of butchered science going on in this thread. But don't let that stop you, please, grab that bong and keep going.

by all means contribute Oatmeal

[Boredom]

lmao

[PancakeBrah]

I've never seen someone so unaware and confident simultaneously as namix. He's condescending and ignorant. One of the worst type of people.

[namix]

Originally Posted by cakecakecake

I've never seen someone so unaware and confident simultaneously as namix. He's condescending and ignorant. One of the worst type of people.

DEFINITELY wasnt trying to be condescending, not sure how i was?

Split - seriously, if i was 'condescending', definitely apologize, wasn't trying to be in the least.

[oats]

On my phone and at the airport, but you guys should revisit Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle, law vs. theory (and the process it takes to move from the latter to the former), as well as the limitations of entanglement (speed, mass, etc). That's just the stuff I recall at the moment.

[dead man]

sounds like namix was trying to start a phenomenological discussion of some sort. its a school of thought that criticizes the entire field of natural sciences as they stand.. not invalid but unpopular in many circles im sure..

idk about this thread its too much weirdness in here already. give people an opportunity to flex what theyve learned on stoned google voyages and boom you have 3 pages

[namix]

Originally Posted by dead man

sounds like namix was trying to start a phenomenological discussion of some sort. its a school of thought that criticizes the entire field of natural sciences as they stand.. not invalid but unpopular in many circles im sure..

idk about this thread its too much weirdness in here already. give people an opportunity to flex what theyve learned on stoned google voyages and boom you have 3 pages

word up, was just trying to throw another angle out there.

honestly my worldview is super simple, pretty much every field and mode of thought is just trying to explain the same shit from a different angle, and they all pretty much lead to the same place in the end if you keep asking "why" long enough.

[Nigma]

Originally Posted by namix

word up, was just trying to throw another angle out there.

honestly my worldview is super simple, pretty much every field and mode of thought is just trying to explain the same shit from a different angle, and they all pretty much lead to the same place in the end if you keep asking "why" long enough.

I've been reading into causality a lot these last few years. It's literally a paradigm shifting realization tbh

[namix]

Originally Posted by Nigma

I've been reading into causality a lot these last few years. It's literally a paradigm shifting realization tbh

yea bro... i went off the deep end by pretty much everyone's standards, which is why most people which have a similar realization pendulum swing back and/or don't talk about it and/or go any further.


hey, at a minimum, that realization made me very effective at a job that requires predicting trends, tracking online buyer behavior, navigating everyone online to a conversion they believe they are making themselves, and predicting the trends all over again lol

[Nigma]

Originally Posted by namix

yea bro... i went off the deep end by pretty much everyone's standards, which is why most people which have a similar realization pendulum swing back and/or don't talk about it and/or go any further.


hey, at a minimum, that realization made me very effective at a job that requires predicting trends, tracking online buyer behavior, navigating everyone online to a conversion they believe they are making themselves, and predicting the trends all over again lol

Having an outdoor job and watching the formation of clouds has given me an excellent nose for weather prediction. It does have it's random and sporadic advantages, may as well try to enjoy them.

[Split]

Originally Posted by Nigma

I've been reading into causality a lot these last few years. It's literally a paradigm shifting realization tbh

what's that


also on the topic of looking for answers. if there's a box in front of me, I might think "what's in there" then open it. Inside is a smaller box. I might wonder about that box, then open it. Smaller box. open that. keeps going and going and going

eventually ive placed the question aside and have just begun opening boxes until there aren't anymore

But my question is still valid, though

[namix]

Originally Posted by Split

what's that


also on the topic of looking for answers. if there's a box in front of me, I might think "what's in there" then open it. Inside is a smaller box. I might wonder about that box, then open it. Smaller box. open that. keeps going and going and going

eventually ive placed the question aside and have just begun opening boxes until there aren't anymore

But my question is still valid, though

don't disagree at all man, still not sure where you think we were in disagreement.


how many smaller boxes would you need to see before believing they were infinite? and if you believed they were infinite, would you keep looking for them?

[Nigma]

@Split Go look up a youtube vid or documentary on causality, one does not simply explain it in one message.

[Split]

Originally Posted by Nigma

@Split Go look up a youtube vid or documentary on causality, one does not simply explain it in one message.

I know what causality is, how was it a paradigm shifting realization for you, or what did you mean by that

[Nigma]

Originally Posted by Split

I know what causality is, how was it a paradigm shifting realization for you, or what did you mean by that

For me in particular, it was fascinating in terms of the medical field and the nature of illness. That's one way in particular that stands out

[Dr Expert]

I have had much discussion on this very area with my work colleagues. There is such a unanimous decision within the scientific community and overseas expatriates. Listen if you can understand and follow, then very well.
- while some people cannot understand these concepts such as the space time continuum and the other world metaphysical theory, for some obvious reasons I am happy to assist.
- Science is manmade – as in it is made by men, following from this thesis we find that man are in fact men…
- And what is a man if nothing but just flesh and blood and connections of neurones? Flesh and blood contains polarity and magnetism (your amino acids and essential haemoglobins) remember these are PHYSICAL and CONCRETE properties...
- How can flesh and blood equate to truth? It does not equate truth because truth is not a concrete PROPERTY but rather a metaphysical CONCEPT.
- Therefore science is based on OUTside assumptions/the thoughts of physical men. Science should never be REGARDED as based on EVIDENCE rather than the PEOPLE (flesh and blood, neurones and amino acids) who OBSERVE the evidence.
- Therefore science is INcorrect and should be DISregarded at all junctures.
Although in conclusion: as we move towards the philosophical DUALITY of thought-science-technology we find more and more of these so called QUANTUM quandaries. Things are happening “faster” but at the same “time” our knowledge of the SELF is “stagnating”.

[namix]

Originally Posted by Dr Expert

I have had much discussion on this very area with my work colleagues. There is such a unanimous decision within the scientific community and overseas expatriates. Listen if you can understand and follow, then very well.
- while some people cannot understand these concepts such as the space time continuum and the other world metaphysical theory, for some obvious reasons I am happy to assist.
- Science is manmade – as in it is made by men, following from this thesis we find that man are in fact men…
- And what is a man if nothing but just flesh and blood and connections of neurones? Flesh and blood contains polarity and magnetism (your amino acids and essential haemoglobins) remember these are PHYSICAL and CONCRETE properties...
- How can flesh and blood equate to truth? It does not equate truth because truth is not a concrete PROPERTY but rather a metaphysical CONCEPT.
- Therefore science is based on OUTside assumptions/the thoughts of physical men. Science should never be REGARDED as based on EVIDENCE rather than the PEOPLE (flesh and blood, neurones and amino acids) who OBSERVE the evidence.
- Therefore science is INcorrect and should be DISregarded at all junctures.
Although in conclusion: as we move towards the philosophical DUALITY of thought-science-technology we find more and more of these so called QUANTUM quandaries. Things are happening “faster” but at the same “time” our knowledge of the SELF is “stagnating”.

Exactly. Much more concise and better surmised than my braindumps, good shit.

I've gotten 'better' at speaking to an individual about these topics, but in a community, knowing everyone hears it different, i just throw shit out there, and am very ineffective at resonating with anyone who doesnt already get it lol.

[VividEnds]

Originally Posted by Dr Expert

I have had much discussion on this very area with my work colleagues. There is such a unanimous decision within the scientific community and overseas expatriates. Listen if you can understand and follow, then very well.
- while some people cannot understand these concepts such as the space time continuum and the other world metaphysical theory, for some obvious reasons I am happy to assist.
- Science is manmade – as in it is made by men, following from this thesis we find that man are in fact men…
- And what is a man if nothing but just flesh and blood and connections of neurones? Flesh and blood contains polarity and magnetism (your amino acids and essential haemoglobins) remember these are PHYSICAL and CONCRETE properties...
- How can flesh and blood equate to truth? It does not equate truth because truth is not a concrete PROPERTY but rather a metaphysical CONCEPT.
- Therefore science is based on OUTside assumptions/the thoughts of physical men. Science should never be REGARDED as based on EVIDENCE rather than the PEOPLE (flesh and blood, neurones and amino acids) who OBSERVE the evidence.
- Therefore science is INcorrect and should be DISregarded at all junctures.
Although in conclusion: as we move towards the philosophical DUALITY of thought-science-technology we find more and more of these so called QUANTUM quandaries. Things are happening “faster” but at the same “time” our knowledge of the SELF is “stagnating”.

Lol'd