Who believes in the paranormal?

[Lenox]

Originally Posted by Vito Cortez

I BELIEVE YOUR A FAGGOT

[Destroyer]

I barely believe in the normal

[Elemental P]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

I barely believe in the normal

Foreal. What constitutes as normal anyway. I just hate everything equally.

And Lenox go take a walk buddy. Fucking waltzing around with that 0-4 record shame you on you

[Chyeahhh!!!]

Originally Posted by Twodrop

Yes, demons are real, they prey on the weak minded.... It's funny u made a suicide thread earlier. That's all demons.

Those twin bitches jumping into traffic, DEMONS

The devil is real, the earth is flat, jews run shit, nukes don't exist, dinosaurs are propaganda, forests are actually Carbon farms, Giants are real, NASA is ran by Nazi's...

All obvious to the trained eye.

If u don't believe this u are only falling victim to the indoctrination of our past

Testify

props on the twin blondes man that shit was crazy I remember that

[Chyeahhh!!!]

I believe that ghosts, werewolves, vamps, aliens, angels, demons etc are just physical and metaphysical manifestations of interdimensional beings.

Someone banged it on the head , normal vs paranorm, what is paranormal really? We've all be indoctrinated and conditioned on what normal is. Anything outside of it is abnormal, paranormal, but what if the paranorm has always been there but our perception has been so suppressed that anything outside of what we've been programmed to see is considered crazy...etc.

Reality is perception based and perception can be manipulated, especially by coercive suggestibility which in this case is mainstream thought vs lesser popular thought, majority vs the minor.

[Cred]

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh!!!

I believe that ghosts, werewolves, vamps, aliens, angels, demons etc are just physical and metaphysical manifestations of interdimensional beings.

Someone banged it on the head , normal vs paranorm, what is paranormal really? We've all be indoctrinated and conditioned on what normal is. Anything outside of it is abnormal, paranormal, but what if the paranorm has always been there but our perception has been so suppressed that anything outside of what we've been programmed to see is considered crazy...etc.

Reality is perception based and perception can be manipulated, especially by coercive suggestibility which in this case is mainstream thought vs lesser popular thought, majority vs the minor.

What do you thinks the reasoning for hiding it though? People can’t get used to seeing paranormal/abnormal things? If it were introduced wouldn’t the perception of abnormal/paranorm be changed to normal?

[Destroyer]

Yes, chyeaah, as usual, is a moron

[Destroyer]

And I believe that, completely

[Ghost1]

not that i prescribe to that line of logic...but i figure the reasoning would be a form of control placed on us by the upper echelon likely with the idea that introducing the paranormal would disrupt the comfy capitalist global economy that they are all very content with.

[Ghost1]

lmao des vs chyea longest running beef on nc ....one of my favs

[Cred]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

not that i prescribe to that line of logic...but i figure the reasoning would be a form of control placed on us by the upper echelon likely with the idea that introducing the paranormal would disrupt the comfy capitalist global economy that they are all very content with.

Literally thought about it after I posted that and realized it was a form of control through fear.

[Ghost1]

right, its an abstraction of that idea...but that idea is definitely real

[Twodrop]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

right, its an abstraction of that idea...but that idea is definitely real

control through fear.. and what do the majority of humans fear the most?!

Death.

there are infinite parallel universes where u drop dead at ur phone/comp reading this

However, ur reading this

spiritual growth has nothing to do with our remedial life spans

[Ghost1]

what is that M-theory>? its a fun theory but meh

[Inno]

Channel zero explains it all yo.

That nigga Carl Sagan didn’t believe in the Drake equation my niggas

Get hip

[Elemental P]

Good shit I fucks with what some y'all said but I agree with Cheyah at the fact that everything is based off our perception and everything plays a role on that, from our environment to our upbringing. What one person thinks is normal someone else can easily think it's as normal. It gets pretty interesting tho, I think the movie LUCY made a lot of interesting points if anyone hasn't seen it it's worth watching

[Elemental P]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

what is that M-theory>? its a fun theory but meh

Nah that's Multi verse theory he was mentioning where there's an infinite number of outcome and basically any time you had the option to choose something different, supposedly an alternative universe is created and splits in to its own time line.

M theory is basically supposed to be the theory that combines quantum physics/mechanics, string theory etc to Einstein's theory of relativity.

[Witty]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

not that i prescribe to that line of logic...but i figure the reasoning would be a form of control placed on us by the upper echelon likely with the idea that introducing the paranormal would disrupt the comfy capitalist global economy that they are all very content with.

Before this comfy capitalist global economy existed..the paranormal (assuming the entire idea is not nonsense for sake of argument) existed, and also the means of recording evidence.

[Chyeahhh!!!]

Originally Posted by Cred

What do you thinks the reasoning for hiding it though? People can’t get used to seeing paranormal/abnormal things? If it were introduced wouldn’t the perception of abnormal/paranorm be changed to normal?

Not necessarily IMO, because perception also effects the mainstream paradigm of what we perceive as real and not real or what the society as a whole dictates as real or not real for you.

For instance

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5Wc5ZMpCTk

now what would you say this was if you saw it with your own eyes? This is your own visual perception of what you're seeing and you will describe it as whatever comes to you and what caused this. It's your opinion that you're universally allowed to have.

Now you have the news lady basically telling you what it is and basically crushing your own perception of what you visibly witnessed with your own eyes by someone who did not see it with there own eyes.

Given the mindset of most of the viewers, they'll chalk it up to what the news lady said. Case closed, nothing to see here, keep it moving. There in lies the issue of what you said. Many who viewed this who are more inclined to question or have an independent train of though will stick to there gut that the cause given by the news lady is not the cause behind what they themselves saw..that's the paranormal, alternative viewpoint that still needs explanation. I'll also so that's it's more of a less popular opinion being it is not shared by the mainstream.

On the other hand those that believe the news lady's cause behind the sky phenomenon in that video...it's more of a feasible explanation that thwarts any further thought or questioning into the matter....hence the norm.

[Witty]

Or hence the fact that she knows what she's talking about.