WHY DO WE NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR SELF CONSCIENCE-NESS AND SELECTIVELY BREED

[Amen]

MY kids are genetic freaks of nature.

My oldest son 12years old is currently undefeated in greco wrestling. KId is phenomenal and it's his passion and I support him 100%.

All thou, I'd love for him to play baseball and football, over the homo wrestling and MMA, I support him and do it with him to show support.

My youngest son 7 years old - is a beast as baseball and football. He's always being drafted by some league to play with kids that are much older. I think it's a little insane as I want him to continue to develop but the opportunity for exposure at such a young age is there for him. It's stressful because, football - it typically goes by weight and/or age. He's 7 years old and 55 lbs, solid. But when compared to the kids in the league, he's extremely small. Thats what scares me. He's the half back and the safety - and his intensity and heart keeps him competing with kids a lot older. But I think I"m going to try and keep him at the level he SHOULD be in for developmental reasons. I huge kid landing on my son can end him easily, considering he's so small in comparison to those in the league. It's a tough decision, but as a parent, I have to do whats best for him.

It's no surprise my children are very athletic, I was really athletic as well and still am. I'm involved in everything they do, as far as coaching their teams and even at home. I do not allow them to sit in front of a monitor and play video games. Thats a privileged. They understand that if they want to grow up and be the superstars they dream to be, it takes work. SO we do just that, WORK.

My sports were baseball, football, track n field, swimming/diving and boxing.

Football and baseball being my 2 favorite were shattered in a college game when my ACL and Achilles tore. Not fun.

I was going to pursue boxing but the birth of my oldest slowed that down for me and I ended up giving up on it, sadly.

It's how you raise them. Genetics are a big factor but how you raise them, is essential. I've coach both of my boys in every sport they compete in and see the difference between parents who spend the time I spend with mine and parents who just allow their kids to sit in front of a TV for either watching TV or playing video games. There is a major difference in the level of intensity and hand eye coordination when competing against one another. Parents these days just allow their kids to play games day in and day out and it's killing their potential... Their natural born gifts (if they had any passed down genetically) Thank god my boys have good genes from both his mother and myself. She was really athletic as well and played softball all the way through college nearly making pro until she met me and kind of gave up on it, smh.

You guys can talk all the shit you want, but remember the name "SANTIAGO"

Because in either baseball, football or wrestling and/or MMA that name will take over once my kids are at that level of competition later in life.

Watch.

[sral]

Originally Posted by dickNoze

MY kids are genetic freaks of nature.

https://s3.postimg.org/ltxpa52w3/image.jpg


You're a lying deadbeat piece of shit for a father anyway.

They must be so proud.

[Ghost1]

Originally Posted by sraL

You're a lying deadbeat piece of shit for a father anyway.

They must be so proud.

oh shit lol

[Amen]

Originally Posted by sraL

https://s3.postimg.org/ltxpa52w3/image.jpg


You're a lying deadbeat piece of shit for a father anyway.

They must be so proud.

oh you found a picture I posted on here a while ago.

Cool.

Keep reaching.

Lol @ a picture with my boys making me a deadbeat.

You're all delusional and retarded.

[sral]

Originally Posted by dickNoze

oh you found a picture I posted on here a while ago.

Cool.

Keep reaching.

Lol @ a picture with my boys making me a deadbeat.

You're all delusional and retarded.

lmao i didn't obtain that from this website.

there are more.

consider that a warning faggot.

push my buttons and watch how quick things can get ugly for you.

[Amen]

Originally Posted by sraL

lmao i didn't obtain that from this website.

there are more.

consider that a warning faggot.

push my buttons and watch how quick things can get ugly for you.

LMAO, bro - I don't give 2 shits what YOU or anyone thinks. Let's be real here, neither of you affect me in any way.

Do as you please, FAGGOT.

[~RustyGunZ~]

What we need to do is lab create some human/animal hybrids for war

[~RustyGunZ~]

Disregard last post amen already posted proof above it won't yield great results

[Amen]

lol, you're such a fag, bruh.

[sral]

Okay @Blanco Bishop i'm about to play devils advocate in this thread a little since you indulged...

In what way is it not "plausible"?

I could argue that we do, already, select for beauty in our mating partners. And we do select for intelligence. Now, I may or may not be defining beauty as inner beauty, or emotional suitability as a spouse. I may or may not be defining intelligence as "gaming the system", for example people like Kim Kardashian do know how to earn a very good living, without building rockets or curing cancer in the garage. But the human race has pretty much been getting just what it wants, one baby step a generation, just like all other sexually reproducing species.

This is happening via natural selection, all around us, right now and has been for years.

Are we not already "selectively" breeding in a sense?

[Blanco Bishop]

Originally Posted by sraL

Okay @Blanco Bishop i'm about to play devils advocate in this thread a little since you indulged...

In what way is it not "plausible"?

I could argue that we do, already, select for beauty in our mating partners. And we do select for intelligence. Now, I may or may not be defining beauty as inner beauty, or emotional suitability as a spouse. I may or may not be defining intelligence as "gaming the system", for example people like Kim Kardashian do know how to earn a very good living, without building rockets or curing cancer in the garage. But the human race has pretty much been getting just what it wants, one baby step a generation, just like all other sexually reproducing species.

This is happening via natural selection, all around us, right now and has been for years.

Are we not already "selectively" breeding in a sense?

That's why I mentioned Darwinism bro.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Totes mcdude

Stfu you lonely piece of shit

@glossy

[~RustyGunZ~]

Lmao

Why gods gift to women look like the dude with 4 different custodial contracts and a rusty huffy

[UnbornBuddha]

Ah! as one author stated "a glimpse into human delusions of superiority"

There is hardly never a direct 1:1 relationship between one gene and one phenotypic trait. In general, most traits are polygenic and most genes are pleiotropic (affect many different traits). It is more accurate to think of the situation as a huge, complex network of genes and gene products influencing each other. The heritability of personality traits and certain complex hereditary diseases tend to be moderate (calculated from twin and adoption studies). Using Genome-wide association studies to analyze hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), scientists have found that candidate SNPs can only account for a fraction of his heritability (“missing heritability problem”). This may be accounted for by rare gene variants that are unique for different populations, variation in copy number or genetic interactions.

While invariably the quest for the perfect race came before 18th- 20th-century scientific outgrowths, most of the arguments stem from antiquated scientific understandings of the genetic code. The modern idea of differential reproduction comes from skewed misunderstandings of anthropological research, which became a fulcrum that gave rise to bizarre Eugenic theoretical constructs.
Such misunderstandings come not only from misrepresentations of the ideas of popular figures like Darwin or Herbert Spencer. But other figures such as the Swedish botanist and zoologist Carl Von Linnaeus, attributed with the binomial system of taxonomy nomenclature for genus identification, including the sub speciation of hominids. Linnaeus created a the taxon "monstrosus" for "wild and monstrous humans, unknown groups and more or less abnormal people. I refer you to Willoughby work on "The Evolution of Modern Humans in Africa" for a more comprehensive outline.

But Darwin's contemporary, Herbert Spencer, used Darwinian concepts, like natural selection, and twisted them to suit his own intents with social divisions in mind. Of course, as a modern veterinarian puts it, nascent pseudoscience had a prominent play as well. Spencer followers began to increasingly reference certain classes of hominids with chauvinistic slogans such as "human weeds" that ought to be exterminated or at least allowed to selectively breed.

Now going back to my main premise. Genetic interaction between two people is a complex subject. Its not as simple as two individuals with desirable traits mating. For example, someone with a genetic predisposition toward hayfever and other allergic conditions such as dermatitis, may not actually manifest the genetic tendency until 3 or 4 generations later. The same can be said with morphological attributes such as heterochromia iridum. Now due to the advent of modern findings, we are at a juncture where manipulation of certain genes is quite possible and the bioethics of it is already a popular issue with various political and medical oppositional stances.

There is also the issue that what is viewed as desirable, in terms of morphology and physicality, is highly cultural and socially dependable. Many medical or historical anthropologists would tell you this. That said the original premise of this thread argued for some universal physical or mental prowess that if genetically manipulated through controlled reproduction will show consistency in manifesting in the human race.
Again if history has proven its point, such endeavors are not so simplistic that just by allowing those with better traits to reproduce, their offspring will possess those desirable traits. Genetic determinism has many fallacious aspects to it. I refer you to Arguments and Analysis in Bioethics by Matti Häyry for an outline of these, even just reading the preface will suffice to gain an understanding of the many issues at play.

Essentially this idea has been refuted. Lamarck evolutionism, what your arguing for, have failed to have validity in hereditary studies. As Abraham Myerson puts it "‘ … the potentialities of any person’s germ plasm in the succeeding generations may be ascertained. There are fine people springing from the most unlikely parents, and the finest parents may bring forth the wildest and most inadequate progeny". Even Darwin's own ideas of pangenesis are criticized for its Lamarckian assertions.

[uh-oh]

Keep your kid in his division bro. There was a tough tiny kid on my midget team and his dad was a coach. We ran oklahoma drills in like a tourney sense, if you lost you were out. He was popping kids because they were dumb kids and he was an animal who understood his speed made up for his size and he could get under. I was a fullback/linebacker at the time one of the fastest kids on the team and we met in the drill. We collided pretty good and i had to pretend like i was hurt but in reality im sure i concussed the kid. It was an ohhhhh hit and he was on the ground holding his head lmao so i was like ahhh that hirt too. In reality i wouldve stepped on his chest and kept it moving in a game but he was my teammate yadig

I was also born at the cutoff so my first year i played with kids in my grade, 4th grade or whatever, that was that year, but in 5th grade i played with 6th graders, and then in 6th grade i still played with 6th graders it was weird. In 7th i played for both middle school teams 7th and 8th. By then i was fat and smoking weed tho so i played de and g. I got bodied religiously by 8th graders but could slip blocks here and there

I was always better playing with kids my age though. He'll look better with kids his own age and he aint gonna get lit up as easy. I was barely making the cutoff to be a ball carrier in those years. Thats kind of what you want. Unless hes a tiny scat back.

[Amen]

Yea man. The thing is, the kids his age can not tackle nor keep up with him LOL.

He's a beast. But I'd rather keep him where he belongs.

Same went for me, in middle school I was playing with high school kids, because of my speed and agility.

Oh well. Either way, these kids are going to go pro, one day.

[Diode]

Originally Posted by dickNoze

Yea man. The thing is, the kids his age can not tackle nor keep up with him LOL.

He's a beast. But I'd rather keep him where he belongs.

Same went for me, in middle school I was playing with high school kids, because of my speed and agility.

Oh well. Either way, these kids are going to go pro, one day.

And look at you now..

I will set up an escrow for $10k that says neither of your kids will make it to the professional level of any of the big 4 American sports.

Winner take all.

Interested?

[uh-oh]

Originally Posted by Diode

And look at you now..

I will set up an escrow for $10k that says neither of your kids will make it to the professional level of any of the big 4 American sports.

Winner take all.

Interested?

The 10k wont mean as much if his kids making millions tho

[Amen]

Originally Posted by Diode

And look at you now..

I will set up an escrow for $10k that says neither of your kids will make it to the professional level of any of the big 4 American sports.

Winner take all.

Interested?

Let's do it.

Lol @ grown men trying to belittle my kids.

Sad life you live.

[NYCSPITZ]

Originally Posted by dickNoze

Let's do it.

Lol @ grown men trying to belittle my kids.

Sad life you live.

aren't u from queens? TO test your progeny and their extrapolated athletic ability I suggest we play handball, I haven't played in a while. You got left to 2 at the court of your choice or straight up for $500.