His Goodbye Letter

[Natural]

Originally Posted by Split Eight

He evaluated your writing and your writing alone

Did you miss the parts where he talked entirely about your verse?

They are fair and accurate criticisms

Perhaps you could interpret your piece in an entirely positive manner, but that isn't bias. It is opinion. It is grounded in literal details

I don't agree.
I think he came in with the intent to discredit my writing...
And did it like a back handed compliment in the sense

It'd seemingly look nice he's feeding my piece(compliment) but no matter what he's going to discredit every single piece I ever do(back hand)

[Lars]

Originally Posted by Natural

Bl ah blah blah
It's biased because his feed is based on reputation
I'm not a popular name around here and it's not the norm
for someone to be genuine when feeding my work.
Hence he is just following a trend.
I'm not here to make friends....
I'm here to improve my craft and I've succeeded in that quite frankly
If you had followed my work from beginning to now you'd know I have

As soon as I alias up and remove that reputation from the equation
I recieve generally positive feed....
A mixture of positives and negatives
Occasionally full out praise...with no real negative.

NEVER under any other alias I've had....has feed been this bad.
Furthermore I am confident in my own writing enough so
To know the difference between genuine feed and this shit

lmao who exactly are you trying to convince here, me, or yourself?

[Natural]

Why use this account then?
Good question.
I won't be long.
But you'll still be feeding my work.

[PancakeBrah]

Triple post ftw.

Your other accounts probably got that 'I need to get my feed in, here's a carbon copy response saying this was good' feed.

Can you quote this post and change the words? That always doesn't look horribly pathetic.

[Natural]

Originally Posted by PancakeBrah

Triple post ftw.

Your other accounts probably got that 'I need to get my feed in, here's a carbon copy response saying this was good' feed.

Can you quote this post and change the words? That always doesn't look horribly pathetic.

"Probably"?

Your taking stabs in the dark now.

[Lars]

lmao in all honesty, if my piece needs bumping I respond favourably to the first 2-3 at the top of the page in the hope they start the ball rolling positively for when the better members read it

don't think you're at all special just because I used you to get me a HOF nod faggot

roflzzz

[Natural]

Originally Posted by Lars

lmao in all honesty, if my piece needs bumping I respond favourably to the first 2-3 at the top of the page in the hope they start the ball rolling positively for when the better members read it

don't think you're at all special just because I used you to get me a HOF nod faggot

roflzzz

You just made yourself look stupid(at least to anyone with any integrity).

Smh

[Certain]

The problem isn't that you're not good. We're very happy to help. You have potential. We all were where you are at some point. The problem is that your ego dwarfs your ability at a level rarely seen, and it shows in every post. So if you do come back, cut the crap.

[Natural]

Originally Posted by Certain

The problem isn't that you're not good. We're very happy to help. You have potential. We all were where you are at some point. The problem is that your ego dwarfs your ability at a level rarely seen, and it shows in every post. So if you do come back, cut the crap.

One person who spoke half truth. Wow.
he problem isn't that you're not good. ←Correct.
The problem is you're ego dwarfs your ability at a level rarely seen ←Incorrect

I never claimed to be top teir. I never said I was better than everybody.
I don't go around acting like I'm God and when I do get legit feed
I return that favor legitimately to them if its possible.

I'm humble about my abilities as a writer.

[Eŋg]

Originally Posted by Certain

We all were where you are at some point.

i wasn't.

[Lars]

I'm bored of you already.

Pink slip?

Any topic/alias you want to post under. Make it due tomorrow Sweden time.

[PancakeBrah]

It happens a lot. Sometimes it's easier to leave a generic, vague compliment than truly break down someones problems and try to help.

See this topic as an example;

http://netcees.co/showthread.php?t=45223

[Lars]

lmao did you think you were intimidating when Striktas sister told you no and you forced yourself on her regardless?

[Natural]

Originally Posted by Lars

nonsense

[Split]

Cake has never participated in the COTR phenomenon, he is regarded as top tier, he spent a long time breaking down your writing, you have never really insulted him ad don't "board"

He has no motivation or predisposition for bias

You are being irrational unless you can prove some aspect of his feed was dishonest or unfair compared to his other feed

[Natural]

Originally Posted by Split Eight

Cake has never participated in the COTR phenomenon, he is regarded as top tier, he spent a long time breaking down your writing, you have never really insulted him ad don't "board"

He has no motivation or predisposition for bias

You are being irrational unless you can prove some aspect of his feed was dishonest or unfair compared to his other feed

There is no hard proof for any argument in this conversation. I can speak logically..(which I am) and you can continue to claim I'm not and that I'm wrong.
Its a never ending cycle(unless of coarse we just agree to disagree or I'm banned).

[PancakeBrah]

You're not getting banned.

I told you in another piece you have posted that I thought your writing needed work and you asked me to explain. You obviously enjoy dropping Open Mics as you've written a ton of them recently. I have my own preconceptions of what is a 'good' topical/open mic piece and that's what fueled all of the criticisms I wrote. You can say I'm wrong. It's my opinion. I do think if you took some of my criticisms to heart your writing would improve. But I'm far from perfect so do you. All apologies for making this into a discussion at the expense of further feed.

[Split]

agreeing to disagree implies there is no.such thing as objective truth

and technically, i am being logical because I am pointing to what is on the page and you are drawing conclusions without any premises

isn't it possible that Pancake was merely harsh?

[Natural]

Originally Posted by Split Eight

agreeing to disagree implies there is no.such thing as objective truth

and technically, i am being logical because I am pointing to what is on the page and you are drawing conclusions without any premises

isn't it possible that Pancake was merely harsh?

Isnt it possible that pancake may be feeding me negatively to get a rise out of me?

[Split]

It isnt in his character. He's an honest feeder.

Anyways. This thread has enough posts. I will be retreating to my quarters shortly