You've all lost it.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

when you gaslight a person in an argument you make a presumption towards their psychological state or position in the discussion to undermine their argument in hopes of strengthening yours.



this is an example where knock attempts to presuppose my frame of mind....which he cant possibly do factually.... the purpose of this is to try and discredit me as a reliable source of information attempting the defamation of my character or level of intelligence.

Nah man you’re using it too broadly lol

That in no way is making me force an idea you’re delusional

I’m saying you are just full of yourself

That is pretty factual in regards to here. I can’t speak on the same thing in regards to you outside of here. But here you think the status you’ve worked so hard on makes your word fact.

[dull boy]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

Nah man you’re using it too broadly lol

That in no way is making me force an idea you’re delusional

I’m saying you are just full of yourself

That is pretty factual in regards to here. I can’t speak on the same thing in regards to you outside of here. But here you think the status you’ve worked so hard on makes your word fact.

I applaud your proper use of contractions here, but punctuation is still getting circled in red ink.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by dull boy

I applaud your proper use of contractions here, but punctuation is still getting circled in red ink.

I just don’t really know why you bothered posting this

I have a higher education than you

So does Amen

People don’t bother using proper grammar when typing on smart phones to converse with internet folk

Guess Bags is an idiot to your standards since he fails to use autocorrect?

[dull boy]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

I just don’t really know why you bothered posting this

I have a higher education than you

So does Amen

People don’t bother using proper grammar when typing on smart phones to converse with internet folk

Guess Bags is an idiot to your standards since he fails to use autocorrect?

Posted it because I wish people would act like they’re educated, and not illiterate retards. Not sure what anyone’s education level has to do with this.

[Eŋg]

Originally Posted by dull boy

I applaud your proper use of contractions here, but punctuation is still getting circled in red ink.

the inclusion of the possessive apostrophe in the rare instance he should omit it triggers me with people who profess to be intellectual.

[Ghost1]

again telling me what I think lol

amen...u see?

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by Ghost1

again telling me what I think lol

amen...u see?

Dude

Maybe retake psych 101 or whatever one of those useless lib art classes teaches those super basic terms?

The definition is literally online

You don’t use it correctly god dammit YOURE GASLIGHTING ME

[~RustyGunZ~]

A context relating to you here would be me trying to force an idea in an argument with you that you weren’t ever successful here. That is false, I mean not really many things are facts but there’s no evidence than not that it’s true. Me saying because of your success you have an ego problem is not gaslighting. I really don’t see how you’re confused by this with all the mind field shit you consume. It’s the most horribly wrongly used term in arguments bar none probably but I thought you were better than the usual FB comment troll

[Amen]

I see.

[uh-oh]

if you see any of my sentences or posts begin with a capitol letter, its because i'm on a phone. the more you know.

also the fact i know what gaslighting is disappoints me. i feel like its a new age faggot word i didn't hear of until this year, so i just assume its some made up faggoty shit.

figured i'd add that

[dull boy]

Originally Posted by uh-oh

if you see any of my sentences or posts begin with a capitol letter, its because i'm on a phone. the more you know.

also the fact i know what gaslighting is disappoints me. i feel like its a new age faggot word i didn't hear of until this year, so i just assume its some made up faggoty shit.

figured i'd add that

It’s a fairly old term. Hope that unburdens you.

[veritas]

Does anyone believe it is somehow possible to detect truth through typed words? Asked another way, am I the only person who feels they can somewhat accurately discern if the person is aligned with their words? Most simply put: Does authenticity have a detectable frequency, and if so, can typed words convey it?

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by veritas

Does anyone believe it is somehow possible to detect truth through typed words? Asked another way, am I the only person who feels they can somewhat accurately discern if the person is aligned with their words? Most simply put: Does authenticity have a detectable frequency, and if so, can typed words convey it?

I think you can maybe draw some conclusions from a long, long dive into things people type. But overall probably not. You’re profession is figuring out people to an extent they can’t figure out on their own to help them, and you’ve misjudged a lot of stuff from me personally and I’m sure others. Typing doesn’t have physical tells and people have the advantage of thinking before they hit enter.

[veritas]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

I think you can maybe draw some conclusions from a long, long dive into things people type. But overall probably not. You’re profession is figuring out people to an extent they can’t figure out on their own to help them, and you’ve misjudged a lot of stuff from me personally and I’m sure others. Typing doesn’t have physical tells and people have the advantage of thinking before they hit enter.

So you don't care at all about being seen as one of the best?

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by veritas

So you don't care at all about being seen as one of the best?

We’re all losers here

Which does not mean I think we’re all losers out of here

[veritas]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

We’re all losers here

Which does not mean I think we’re all losers out of here

Interesting statement. Elab.

[dull boy]

Originally Posted by veritas

Does anyone believe it is somehow possible to detect truth through typed words? Asked another way, am I the only person who feels they can somewhat accurately discern if the person is aligned with their words? Most simply put: Does authenticity have a detectable frequency, and if so, can typed words convey it?

I’d say it’s such an inexact and unreliable practice that to lean too much on it would be unwise.

[veritas]

Originally Posted by dull boy

I’d say it’s such an inexact and unreliable practice that to lean too much on it would be unwise.

That's fair. You know what I am talking about though, yes? You have felt it in text messages yes?

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by veritas

That's fair. You know what I am talking about though, yes? You have felt it in text messages yes?

https://thriveglobal.com/stories/dat...ng-psychology/

[veritas]

Originally Posted by Knucklehead

https://thriveglobal.com/stories/dat...ng-psychology/

Read that. Interesting.