NBL vs Summer/Winter Classic

[Ghost1]

Champing the nbl alone....or any league for that matter is harder.....u generally have to win at least 5-6 battles b4 even getting a title shot....then u have to win the shot.....to get in the playoffs u have to have a winning record....u cant just get in automatically like a tournament. To win a 64 man tourney u only have to win 5battles.

Nbl playoffs is easily a harder task. Not even measurable tbh.

But hey what do i kno. I only champed every single league weve ever had. HO HUM

[Beyond]

Originally Posted by Bags

Champing the nbl alone....or any league for that matter is harder.....u generally have to win at least 5-6 battles b4 even getting a title shot....then u have to win the shot.....to get in the playoffs u have to have a winning record....u cant just get in automatically like a tournament. To win a 64 man tourney u only have to win 5battles.

Nbl playoffs is easily a harder task. Not even measurable tbh.

But hey what do i kno. I only champed every single league weve ever had. HO HUM

I disagree. There's been plenty of times people have gotten title shots from winning just 3 battles because of their name or whatever else.

Making play offs isn't hard either. It's 16 so there's usually some people with .500 and below records in there, too.

Lama had the Summer Classic as the most prestigious followed by an NBL season.

[Sick]

Originally Posted by Beyond

I disagree. There's been plenty of times people have gotten title shots from winning just 3 battles because of their name or whatever else.

Making play offs isn't hard either. It's 16 so there's usually some people with .500 and below records in there, too.

Lama had the Summer Classic as the most prestigious followed by an NBL season.

Ryan made the NBL playoffs with a 3-0 out of the woodwork.