Ravens patriots

[Pharaohs Army]

Originally Posted by Amen

I wasn’t talking about running a containing defense, idiot.

I SAID CONTAIN Brady. Read my last post, stupid. Forcing Brady out of the pocket was the best thing their defense did. Why? Because BRADY is far from a mobile QB and majority of his errors come from outside of the pocket or when attempting to escape pressure.

I dont think you understand what contain means thats why the disagreement with finny

[Amen]

Originally Posted by Pharaohs Army

I dont think you understand what contain means thats why the disagreement with finny

No, I know what containment means, but finny took it way to literally. I know where’s he’s coming from but it wasn’t used in the context he thought.

[Finnydot]

Originally Posted by Amen

No, I know what containment means, but finny took it way to literally. I know where’s he’s coming from but it wasn’t used in the context he thought.

No, you're an idiot. You eluded to forcing him out of the pocket, but thats the OPPOSITE of what CONTAIN means in football.

You rush 4 or 5 at most. You NEVER blitz on 3rd down, he'll kill you. Most teams run stunts and try and get pressure in the middle, you had that right. But that 5th rusher is usually a safety or corner. You need your middle linebackers to play coverage or play gap defense to stop the run. If you blitz a DB that means youre usually in zone to confuse him with elaborate coverages. But brady will STILL go through his progressions and find someone open through the middle or to the outside in short timing routes.

The reason the ravens BEAT THE BREAKS off him was because they got pressure with 4 and sat in man so EVERYONE WAS COVERED and allowed time for the pass rush to get home. Whats crazy is they CAN send a linebacker instead of a DB and still sit tight in coverage.

Basically the ravens beat the pats the way the pats beat everyone else.

[Pharaohs Army]

@uh-oh theres a good chance im betting a chunk of cash on the ravens this weekend if it stays -3 vs. the rams