Gently whispering at a wall

[veritas]

Originally Posted by Knocklehead

Are you normally dishonest?

Let me rephrase,

May I ask you a question that may risk making you defensive and you promise to answer it honestly and openly?

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by veritas

Let me rephrase,

May I ask you a question that may risk making you defensive and you promise to answer it honestly and openly?

You can ask me whatever you want, if you offend me to that point than you can choose to deal with that situation. I’ve no way of knowing how insulting you may attempt to be.

[veritas]

Originally Posted by Knocklehead

You can ask me whatever you want, if you offend me to that point than you can choose to deal with that situation. I’ve no way of knowing how insulting you may attempt to be.

Is it possible that you are bias against Christianity?

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by veritas

Is it possible that you are bias against Christianity?

I don’t believe I am. I think being raised as such, and taking life experiences to validate or invalidate the beliefs just means I have perspective. Being biased against it would make sense if I was raised a different religion, or maybee if something specific involving the church turned me against it. But the path you’re attempting is a bad effort.

[veritas]

Originally Posted by Knocklehead

I don’t believe I am. I think being raised as such, and taking life experiences to validate or invalidate the beliefs just means I have perspective. Being biased against it would make sense if I was raised a different religion, or maybee if something specific involving the church turned me against it. But the path you’re attempting is a bad effort.

the point of my path is that I am going to provide sources of supposed facts. You will then say that these sources do not meet your "rigorous criteria". Even though the realm of spirituality and science are unfortunately opposite. It is not like Standford or MIT are doing research into the persecution of Christians.

However, when I post statistics of Christian death I don't know that you get to just say, "Oh biased article, discard." Because we can show bias in anything. That is one of the tenets of research. Which of course you know, especially after you have equipped this new persona you are trying. and this bad path I am on could prove your own bias as well....which you deny lol. at any rate. My mission continues. have a good day, Seth.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Originally Posted by veritas

the point of my path is that I am going to provide sources of supposed facts. You will then say that these sources do not meet your "rigorous criteria". Even though the realm of spirituality and science are unfortunately opposite. It is not like Standford or MIT are doing research into the persecution of Christians.

However, when I post statistics of Christian death I don't know that you get to just say, "Oh biased article, discard." Because we can show bias in anything. That is one of the tenets of research. Which of course you know, especially after you have equipped this new persona you are trying. and this bad path I am on could prove your own bias as well....which you deny lol. at any rate. My mission continues. have a good day, Seth.

Bias is when you support or oppose something and use that view to shape evidence and facts into whatever holds up your cause. So a source about persecuted Christians by a Muslim organization would probably be biased too. A report from a respected journalist or research company would not be. Any organization that would research any sort of persecution would have no reason not to with Christians. It’s not rocket science.

I’m not sure why the American Baptist community is suddenly going all fake news on the world this past few weeks. You’re acting like the little brother that’s mad his big brother is getting mommy’s attention.

And what persona? Researching things to formulate opinions? I’ve always done that, always been in debate mode. It’s been my thing no matter my time on NC. Eat a dick with that bullshit Amen lite.

[veritas]

Originally Posted by Knocklehead

Bias is when you support or oppose something and use that view to shape evidence and facts into whatever holds up your cause. So a source about persecuted Christians by a Muslim organization would probably be biased too. A report from a respected journalist or research company would not be. Any organization that would research any sort of persecution would have no reason not to with Christians. It’s not rocket science.

I’m not sure why the American Baptist community is suddenly going all fake news on the world this past few weeks. You’re acting like the little brother that’s mad his big brother is getting mommy’s attention.

And what persona? Researching things to formulate opinions? I’ve always done that, always been in debate mode. It’s been my thing no matter my time on NC. Eat a dick with that bullshit Amen lite.

a source about persecuted christians by muslims does not mean that it is automatically false because the group has an agenda of showing how persecuted the christians are man. The facts are the facts.


and if you were truly committed to your Veritas Lite gimmick you would know that ALL research is biased, and that your vaunted science is still not without its flaws. I.E. Hawhtorne effect, observer bias, etc.

You also have to know that modern academic journals have also become corrupted by the SJW crowd. i am sure you already knew that.

Have a good day. Good luck acting like you are not biased too lol.

[DMS]

Originally Posted by veritas

Is it possible that you are bias against Christianity?

Just use philosophical evidence to prove God’s existence and if he has logic he’ll believe.