things that interest you that others dont care about probably thread

Ghost1 · 06-16-2018, 11:26 AM

It's considered historically accurate at this point that Jesus lived, performed healing miracles, exorcised demons, was crucified, rose from the tomb and was seen after by multiple parties.

Tacitus and Josephus attested to Jesus and the histroians that wrote the gospels are considered to be respected and accurate sources of eye witness testimony. The gospel of Luke was dated within 30yrs of Christ's death and Corinthians is dated to within a few years of his death.

As far as historical accuracy the new testament is factually considered the most reliable collection of documented transcripts from the age of antiquity by and large just based off the sheer volume of corroborating documentation. There's literally thousands of transcripts that were discovered parking together the Hebrew transcripts as well as the new testament. Not only are the writings archeologically dated to within decades of Christ's life and death the other sparse collections of academic writings from that age were so few in documented proof and dated to hindreds of years after the information contained in them it's laughable how much more credible the Bible is strictly from an academic stand point. The ONLY reason it is considered with more scrutiny is because it details miraculous events. There are medical miracles defying the natural known laws of science to this day. So miss me w that 2018 caveman logic. Fucking dolt reads a couple aincient Roman textbooks and suddenly is more informed than our present day historical scholars immersed in the research first hand.

If there was factual proof that jesus, christianity and an intelligent designer for the universe DID NOT exist then we wouldn't have some of our most prominent scientists, doctors and theologians still having credible debates on the topic. Honestly the agnostics are losing this debate at present due to all of the recent discoveries in the scientific community.

We get it uh oh u researched ainceint Rome and determined Jesus isn't real because he's a magic fairy tale but 2 years ago you told us all that the meaning of life was to eat pizza rolls and jerk off into your beard and now you're preaching to us about turning your eating habits around and paying women to spend time with you so you'll have to excuse me if I don't take anything you say as genuine or accurate regardless of the conviction in your tone.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

06-16-2018, 11:26 AM	#11
Ghost1 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 26,334 Battle Record: 0-1 Rep Power: 84181445	It's considered historically accurate at this point that Jesus lived, performed healing miracles, exorcised demons, was crucified, rose from the tomb and was seen after by multiple parties. Tacitus and Josephus attested to Jesus and the histroians that wrote the gospels are considered to be respected and accurate sources of eye witness testimony. The gospel of Luke was dated within 30yrs of Christ's death and Corinthians is dated to within a few years of his death. As far as historical accuracy the new testament is factually considered the most reliable collection of documented transcripts from the age of antiquity by and large just based off the sheer volume of corroborating documentation. There's literally thousands of transcripts that were discovered parking together the Hebrew transcripts as well as the new testament. Not only are the writings archeologically dated to within decades of Christ's life and death the other sparse collections of academic writings from that age were so few in documented proof and dated to hindreds of years after the information contained in them it's laughable how much more credible the Bible is strictly from an academic stand point. The ONLY reason it is considered with more scrutiny is because it details miraculous events. There are medical miracles defying the natural known laws of science to this day. So miss me w that 2018 caveman logic. Fucking dolt reads a couple aincient Roman textbooks and suddenly is more informed than our present day historical scholars immersed in the research first hand. If there was factual proof that jesus, christianity and an intelligent designer for the universe DID NOT exist then we wouldn't have some of our most prominent scientists, doctors and theologians still having credible debates on the topic. Honestly the agnostics are losing this debate at present due to all of the recent discoveries in the scientific community. We get it uh oh u researched ainceint Rome and determined Jesus isn't real because he's a magic fairy tale but 2 years ago you told us all that the meaning of life was to eat pizza rolls and jerk off into your beard and now you're preaching to us about turning your eating habits around and paying women to spend time with you so you'll have to excuse me if I don't take anything you say as genuine or accurate regardless of the conviction in your tone.