All Law Enforcement questions/inquiries answered with sincere honesty ITT / Police Stereo Types

boof · 05-17-2018, 07:33 PM

im definitely done with this topic

i was as well. it was a genuine "good to know"

this is how I know you already have yor mind made up and you’re gonna keep asking the same thing until I give you th answer you want. When did I say shoot an unarmed person in the back? I didn’t. Read. But you can never certify that somebody is unarmed until you’ve searched them. Most important thing is officer safety

not sure what this is about. i said i'm glad to know you disagree with the officer that shot unarmed walter scott in the back as he ran away.

do you read what I say to you? Yeah definitely the last time I respond to you in here. You’re a legit moron. But to answer you again, no they should not be reprimanded because they called for suitable reasons. The actuality of the situation wasn’t determined until after the fact, so what you’re about to say next is pointless so don’t. But like I said, every department has a non emergency hotline where you call to report things are aren’t in immediate need of the police. Like the neighbors dog keeps shitting on your lawn.

not sure why you're attacking me but i'm surprised at your answer. in some of these situations the emergency line was called. and i would think that someone calling an emergency line because they mistook somebody doing their job, walking their child, or leaving an airbnb for breaking the law, especially with racist undertones, would come off as a waste of time for you and your co workers. other officers have came out in support of reprimanding excessive inappropriate calls in light of the situations i listed.

I LITERALLY JUST CITED THE MIAMI PD INCIDENT OMFG

there are 10 clips in the video. all 10 show an officer's boot making contact with a detained suspect's head, and in most of them you can clearly see the suspect is not a threat. not sure why you dodged this one unless you didn't watch the video.

definitely questionable but consider these things. The video doesn’t show or tel what kind of call the police were responding to. You didn’t post any supporting information, so we’ll go based off the video alone. The call could have been “a man and a woman were seen on cctv by security with guns and drugs” I’m just saying, it’s for damn sure they weren’t responding to a noise complain with rifles and tact gear. I will say, the commanding officer was definitely too much but the subjects were not searched, we don’t know what the guy on the floor may have behind his back, he was told specific commands that didn’t include “reach behind your back where I can’t see your hands”. Look, action is faster than reaction. 9 times out of 10 if th guy on the floor were to have pulled out a gun from his back he would have shot the officer before the officer was able to react in time. It’s a proven thing and you can search for videos if you’d like. The officer won’t be indicted because the suspect did in fact reach behind his back to where we couldn’t see what was there. Point blank. It definitely is a harsh shoot, but it’s justified as far as the video shows.

the call came from a hotel resident that said they saw daniel through a window holding a rifle. he is an exterminator staying at the hotel to do his job they hired him to do, in which he uses an air soft rifle to take out rodents and shit. is this not something officers could have cross checked with the front desk before rushing in and treating him like an animal? did you genuinely get the feeling as you watched that he might have a weapon behind his back as he sobbed, begging for his life, on his hands and knees? this is a serious question. because if you, nor the guy responsible for taking his life are not able to tell how unthreatening daniel was then i don't have many options but to blame it on mindset training or poor hiring practices. if you admit the officer was too much(btw his rifle has a decal that reads YOURE FUCKED) why are his actions still okay to you? if a different officer was in control of the situation daniel would still be alive, so why doesn't that equate to being charged with anything in your eyes? why is a mans life less important than holding a police officer accountable for unnecessary murder? btw he was indicted and charged with second degree murder but acquitted. the rifle decal was inadmissible.

i'll lay off the butterknife thing for a sec. appreciate your responses.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-17-2018, 07:33 PM	#1
boof Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 1,620 Rep Power: 21316672	im definitely done with this topic i was as well. it was a genuine "good to know" this is how I know you already have yor mind made up and you’re gonna keep asking the same thing until I give you th answer you want. When did I say shoot an unarmed person in the back? I didn’t. Read. But you can never certify that somebody is unarmed until you’ve searched them. Most important thing is officer safety not sure what this is about. i said i'm glad to know you disagree with the officer that shot unarmed walter scott in the back as he ran away. do you read what I say to you? Yeah definitely the last time I respond to you in here. You’re a legit moron. But to answer you again, no they should not be reprimanded because they called for suitable reasons. The actuality of the situation wasn’t determined until after the fact, so what you’re about to say next is pointless so don’t. But like I said, every department has a non emergency hotline where you call to report things are aren’t in immediate need of the police. Like the neighbors dog keeps shitting on your lawn. not sure why you're attacking me but i'm surprised at your answer. in some of these situations the emergency line was called. and i would think that someone calling an emergency line because they mistook somebody doing their job, walking their child, or leaving an airbnb for breaking the law, especially with racist undertones, would come off as a waste of time for you and your co workers. other officers have came out in support of reprimanding excessive inappropriate calls in light of the situations i listed. I LITERALLY JUST CITED THE MIAMI PD INCIDENT OMFG there are 10 clips in the video. all 10 show an officer's boot making contact with a detained suspect's head, and in most of them you can clearly see the suspect is not a threat. not sure why you dodged this one unless you didn't watch the video. definitely questionable but consider these things. The video doesn’t show or tel what kind of call the police were responding to. You didn’t post any supporting information, so we’ll go based off the video alone. The call could have been “a man and a woman were seen on cctv by security with guns and drugs” I’m just saying, it’s for damn sure they weren’t responding to a noise complain with rifles and tact gear. I will say, the commanding officer was definitely too much but the subjects were not searched, we don’t know what the guy on the floor may have behind his back, he was told specific commands that didn’t include “reach behind your back where I can’t see your hands”. Look, action is faster than reaction. 9 times out of 10 if th guy on the floor were to have pulled out a gun from his back he would have shot the officer before the officer was able to react in time. It’s a proven thing and you can search for videos if you’d like. The officer won’t be indicted because the suspect did in fact reach behind his back to where we couldn’t see what was there. Point blank. It definitely is a harsh shoot, but it’s justified as far as the video shows. the call came from a hotel resident that said they saw daniel through a window holding a rifle. he is an exterminator staying at the hotel to do his job they hired him to do, in which he uses an air soft rifle to take out rodents and shit. is this not something officers could have cross checked with the front desk before rushing in and treating him like an animal? did you genuinely get the feeling as you watched that he might have a weapon behind his back as he sobbed, begging for his life, on his hands and knees? this is a serious question. because if you, nor the guy responsible for taking his life are not able to tell how unthreatening daniel was then i don't have many options but to blame it on mindset training or poor hiring practices. if you admit the officer was too much(btw his rifle has a decal that reads YOURE FUCKED) why are his actions still okay to you? if a different officer was in control of the situation daniel would still be alive, so why doesn't that equate to being charged with anything in your eyes? why is a mans life less important than holding a police officer accountable for unnecessary murder? btw he was indicted and charged with second degree murder but acquitted. the rifle decal was inadmissible. i'll lay off the butterknife thing for a sec. appreciate your responses.