![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,008
Battle Record: 23-10
Champed - Art of Writing League
- AOWL Season 5
Rep Power: 23856379 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I respond to you, and you respond to me because we're interested in learning what cannot be learned from each other because what I question is not so different from what you question. What I experience is no different from what you experience. The difference lies in how open is our hearts to it. We are one in the same being wanting to merge, to unite. It is no coincidence you partook in this discussion. This discussion has everything to do with you, though you are resistant to your own change. Though change is going to happen whether we like it or not. And we will be reborn, until we no longer find the need to be born, and we return to the Unborn, which makes us one in the same. Since your liberation is my liberation. Your happiness is my happiness. Your suffering is my suffering. We all have inherently the One mind, the big self, though we have forgotten of it, and take it to be "mystical shit" as you say. Though it's truly who you are. Intrinsic goodness is also the function of what you are. I am interested in others relief from pain, though you may not be interested so much so in alleviating others. But you can start by alleviating your own wounds, and then you'll realize that by healing others wounds you help youself because others are not separate from you. This very "I" that keeps saying is content is a construct you have identified with. Looking at the world in seperation between I and others is a duality that is bound to create dissatisfaction. Simply because inherent in this dichotomy is an aversion to things, which gives rise to likes and dislikes. The dislikes create the vehement states that you see in others. I see your goodness, but its like the sun when covered by clouds. You on the otherhand do not see the sun. You say you understand, but if you truly understood, you wouldn't understand a thing at all. That which understands is the intellect, and the intellect being discriminatory will never understand that which is beyond all logic, all dichotomy, all rationalization, as well as irrationalization. Last edited by UnbornBuddha; 07-22-2014 at 05:53 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|