Harvard Science just took a deuce on your religion

[Split]

A variation of the Big Bang Theory, yeah. Only because of how many different facets of the universe are mathematically consistent within the theory// correlate with observational data in the past and the future.

We don't know the original zeroth state of the universe. The Big Bang Theory as it stands says it began as a singularity, but most of the modern theories use quantum mechanics that are not properly integrated into the BBT to elaborate on the beginnings of the universe



The one that I believe explains the origins of the universe best is the Bubble Universe theory



We know that before the Big Bang (according to the theory) there was homogeneity. Singularity as a point mass, or singularity as nothingness. In the Bubble Universe Theory, when enough of this homogeneity is present (i.e. a true vacuum of all but quantum matter) the presence of those quantum particles within this vacuum determines whether or not this separated region can give rise to a universe AND what the physical laws of this universe are. Further explained by string theory.

But the cool thing is, it allows for multiple universes within the same framework of a multiverse. And it gives a reasonable explanation for how nothing arises from something.
It is very fractal. If you're interested, read Michio Kaku.




CLIFFS.


Time exists where matter exists in spacetime. Time is a function of existence. If nothing exists there is no time.

[maths debate]

Originally Posted by Split Eight

If nothing exists there is no time.

@timeless

[namix]

Originally Posted by Split Eight

Time exists where matter exists in spacetime.

^word

so where space is not a constraint, neither is time

do you believe that existence in the beta state is superior than the other 3 or 4 frequencies?

we only perceive time in one frequency... the rest, space and time don't matter.