so would you rather rape a 3 year old girl, or a dog?

[Witty]

Originally Posted by Wise Ass

Time is an illusion.
@Witty , it only takes 3 lbs of pressure to rip off your eyelid.

Ever try slapping someone with your eyelid ripped off? Aerial spray?

You are out of your league.

You're trying too hard bro, also...what would my eyelid being ripped off have to do with slapping? I'll slap u silly with no eyes son.

[Witty]

Originally Posted by cakecakecake

I know why I lost interest;

You called Immac an idiot. Idiot is almost exclusively gender specific to male. I would never call a girl an idiot. No place. I'd call her worse than that if the situation calls for it, but I srsly can't think of a time I've called a girl an idiot.

Work on that.

You called her an idiot on the last page.

[Flow]

Originally Posted by Split

that's actually false


this is also top notch boarding


I'd fuck the dog, only if it was the little girl's and she was holding its leash

lol this was brilliant

[Anonymous]

It's not like these guys are actually planning to rape a 3 year old girl.
Pls settle down.

[Objective]

[dead man]

Originally Posted by Split

Immaculate you listen, you listen real close. You're a sensationalist idiot. When you talk with people, you respond to every comment individually- and emotionally. You don't try to justify or deconstruct circumstances or look at the discussion, FUCK you don't even separate yourself from the discussion- you place YOURSELF in the situation and blurt out whatever gut feeling smacks into your head. That isnt worldly nigga that's egotistical.

You perceive life a moment at a time, tangent to the curve. And yo, that's fine. But please get off your sidesaddle high horse of absolute objective morality. It's pretty clear you have no place in a theoretical discussion aside from getting some banter in

just to reinforce-
- the ethics of wild speculation about the ACTUAL death of thousands, has no place in the ethics about speculation about the hypothetical rape
- you're trying to argue that childhood innocence is somehow more sacred MISSING THE ENTIRE FUCKING POINT OF THE QUESTION
- somehow knowing someone that got raped is a qualifier for discussing it
- what the fuck are you on about aliens for?

In summary, you saw the word "rape" and saw the perfect opportunity to look down on everyone in this thread smart enough to realize it was comparing the different innocence of two beings, and why we place more value on human life when it has so much more capacity for corruption...

My point: you have no idea how to create a counteragrument. Aliens? The fuck does that mean? Did you even think about anything beyond your impulsive choice? You're a philosophical husk.

Conclusion: Immaculate is officially the least qualified person on these forums to pass judgement on anyone, from now until another proves themselves worthy

charged up from philo 201?

lol

[Split]

caught the end of some Nova on aristotle an was feeling smiteful

idk how to philosophe

[Dope girl]

smh @ thread.

[Brian Bryan]

was this my first thread here?

[FGR]

Originally Posted by super pimp trillionaire

If the dog was feelin him, then whatever. But he said dog rape.

lmao