Netcees Psychology 101 (no Veritas but yes...somewhat Veritas)

[Batty]

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara

On this site, I've witnessed something that proves itself more and more each day. During a disagreement, a match of wits, argument, whatever have you, the first person who calls the other person a faggot is the one who caught feelings first and is presumably the loser. The quarrel may have been civilized up until that point but when the opposing party unleashes a zinger that has gotten under that persons skin, the offended party unleashes the faggot. There in lies the question, if a masterfully skilled boarder such as myself provokes another person here to call me a faggot, I've won, or have I lost for this premeditated provocation? It's damn near a lose/ lose but I win for knowing the pattern/sequence.

discuss

This may spill outside the realms of psych 101.... Have you considered that the true meaning is that it has no meaning? I mean, the word faggot could be said and the sender and receiver could have completely meanings in mind. Maybe people just say "faggot" to everybody because it's just a way to see who's really a faggot or perhaps it's just a term of endearment.

I don't even think we all share the same meaning of what faggot is exactly. For instance I watched a porn once where this Russian dude was banging a hot bitch from behind. He pulled out and skeeted on her back. Then this nigga leans down and licks his own batter off the bitches back.


That was some faggot shit even tho it wasn't.

[Objective]

Depends on the situation. If Subject A has a reason to call Subject B a faggot for acting like a faggot I'd say Subject B has lost due to the amount of positive reactions and the sweet love of democracy backing up Subject A for not being one. Left and Right wing enthusiasts may get involved in the war of faggots, the rest of the board can choose to be neutral, but that makes them faggots as well for not siding with anyone, but at least they don't participate in the royal faggotry that's going on, so they're considered ''ogay''.

In a case where Subject A called Subject B a faggot for no reason, and can't back it up in a way that goes in favor of Subject A through democracy and sheer pressure both might lose because both comes off as faggots for caring about nothing. In this case both subjects along with everyone involved are exposed as faggots. The faggots that keep adding more fuel to the fire may reedem their status of being a fag if lulz are had, and if Faggot A and Faggot B keeps it up it makes them both Super Faggots as the tag-along faggot becomes the winner, is no longer a faggot and is overall a funny ass mofo. This level of funny ass mofo is hard to achieve, many has tried and lost hard in their ridiculous attempts.

However, if only Subject A and Subject B keeps it up the main court of the board may come into play and faggots will be jailed.

Moral of the story; Keep faggotry to a low, if you're a funny faggot you will gain popularity and win even if what you're doing is obvious dickery. Being an unfunny faggot is insta-loss and can only be redeemed by extremely high levels of boarding.

Also; There's a difference between getting under someones skin with a perfect zinger and getting under someones skin by spreading gay shit all over the forum that no-one gives a shit about. Being called a faggot in a thread is high risk ish, but if it's done at the right time and can be justified along with nods from the board the Subject being called a faggot has already lost and should shut the fuck up until further notice.