![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
obsessed
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: fucka idiyote
Posts: 5,709
Battle Record: Faggot-1
Accomplishments - can recite entirety of shrek 2
Champed - tangoed with spider man behind scenes in spider-man 2
- was candidate for gerber baby 3x
- smush parker like bb comment on instagram saying "u fucka suck idiyote"
- smush beer on head and didn't cry
- parallel parked in between 2 ferrari's in tonky truck once
- when saying pledge of allegiance i said "i don't" lmao deadass bb satan
- won tshirt from taco bell saying "taco cat" is the same backwards for filling out 500 surveys in a
- neighbor house caught on fire i call FIRE department and saved lives, was in newspaper
- set neighbor house on fire lmao
- fuck neighbor husband and wife
- first fish caught resembled david ortiz
- colin kaepernick
- related to genghis khan
- elected assistant to the vice president assistant to the president for regional chess club
- never lost game of hide and seek
Rep Power: 8599682 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
theres complete sense in what i'm saying. you neither attributed or pinpointed any of these things. and to what extent are we describing what is what?
from what i recorded, altering anything of your body to achieve something better/desirable, i.e tommy john would fall into that category. it's not necessary to live, unless you go to the extent saying that their livelihood IS that. so you're saying, porn stars, waiting business, strippers are an exception to this? because it's their job right? huhm. and technically they are doing it for performance, though typically different audiences if you're comparing with major league pitchers. lol. so corrective nose jobs are ok with you, but gigantic tits, arent, i see. as long as it isnt outrageous, then it fits well with you on a cognitive level. you were vague on pronouncing whether or not it is, or isn't, just announcing it as 'levels' so level 5 of big tits is more outrageous than level 1 with a restorative nose work? but i guess 'you're not against it', just think it's a deep character flaw. understandable. i guess you can say there is a character flaw, but i think pan saying they should be written off completely is a bit much. I just think it's absurd to write it off as a deep rooted flaw, or something 'serious'. YEAH MAN, YOU DONT LIKE WHAT YOU WERE BORN WITH? THOUGH EVEN PROBABLY, SOCIETYS FAULT, BECAUSE THEY PROBABLY MADE YOU THINK THIS WAY, I BELIEVE YOU SHOULD LIVE WITH IT. CAUSE PLASTIC IS MEANINGLESS. THOUGH I AM NOT AGAINST YOU DOING IT BECAUSE THERES A DEEP CHARACTER FLAW, THERE. lol it's just absurd if you think about in a non-grandiose way. let's take a jump, and ask what about tattoos? and don't say for 'SENTIMENTAL VALUE, MY MOM DIED 7.4 R.IP I LOVE HER THIS BOAT SYMBOLIZES THAT'. (though i'm sure that may be the most prominent reason for a lot of people, but..) It's aesthetic. If tattoo's served no aesthetic purpose, tattoos wouldn't exist. So it is aesthetically based. So that's completely out of question. Even if it's for you just to see (which, typically, on a large scale s'why people that get plastic surgery get the procedures done.) What's the big deal? Yeah, you're not altering yourself with a tattoo, though, aesthetically you sort of are |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
beyondhas2eyes, lold at thread. but im drunk., pancake against plastic v.2, pancake can read tags |
|
|