ITT NAME TWO PEOPLE IF BANNED FOREVER WOULD MAKE NETCEES A BETTER PLACE

[Frank Metts]

Originally Posted by Witty

Is it bad that I actually kinda agree with both points?

Yes it is ... here's why .. you create situations that will cost the country more then the family on welfare ... you over populate jails and orphanages, then you have to build more snd the cycle continues. .. not to mention the damage a child gets from being separated from his parents whether at birth or not it causes damage I deal with these types of children every day. .. plus adoption isn't putting a baby on a doorstep in a wicker basket and ringing a doorbell and running away ... its costs money and not a lot of people are out to adopt right now unless their state offers monthly checks to parents who adopt children like the thing we are trying to get away from .. welfare ... so its just s vicious cycle

Point two would just create more propaganda and anarchy ... plus this is america the place were the popular vote has always been that a popularity contest ... the president is just the face to cheer or blame ... he can't make many decisions on his own, he is basically the scapegoat for how our country is doing in the years he is in office ... he smiles, kisses babies, makes public address someone writes for him and waves plus he gets a presidents salary the rest of his life ... not a bad gig