All Law Enforcement questions/inquiries answered with sincere honesty ITT / Police Stereo Types

[zelti]

i think it's pretty problematic that you equate black lives matters, feminism, rebellion, and inquiring about police protocol. but anyways.



#1 i know what IA is lol, so basically it's easy to get them involved but the lack of actual action taken is the result of the strength of the police union. good to know

im definitely done with this topic

#2 i'm referring to a situation where there is no gun obviously lol. think mentally ill man with butterknife, or homeless person having a bad day and bystander called. i understand if the person is holding a gun that you are not likely to be patient. but on the contrary i have seen situations with white men holding rifles from 50 ft away and police use every bit of tact possible to de escalate without a shot fired.

answered already

#3 so you definitely disagree with the south carolina cop that shot and killed unarmed walter scott in the back as he ran away. that is good to know.

this is how I know you already have yor mind made up and you’re gonna keep asking the same thing until I give you th answer you want. When did I say shoot an unarmed person in the back? I didn’t. Read. But you can never certify that somebody is unarmed until you’ve searched them. Most important thing is officer safety

#4 i'm talking about a woman calling the cops because a black woman is sleeping in a common room on campus. or another woman calling about 3 black people leaving their airbnb with luggage, assuming they were breaking into houses. or the woman that called security on a black man who was just walking his baby in a stroller on a boardwalk. or the woman that called the cops on a black real estate investor as he was inspecting a house. do you think these women should be reprimanded?

do you read what I say to you? Yeah definitely the last time I respond to you in here. You’re a legit moron. But to answer you again, no they should not be reprimanded because they called for suitable reasons. The actuality of the situation wasn’t determined until after the fact, so what you’re about to say next is pointless so don’t. But like I said, every department has a non emergency hotline where you call to report things are aren’t in immediate need of the police. Like the neighbors dog keeps shitting on your lawn.

#5 you can go to youtube and search 'officer kicking suspect in head' and get hundreds of results. here is a compilation of 10(feel free to ignore the source, just watch the video)
https://www.themaven.net/pinacnews/p...GWj2MQ/?full=1

I LITERALLY JUST CITED THE MIAMI PD INCIDENT OMFG

#6

definitely questionable but consider these things. The video doesn’t show or tel what kind of call the police were responding to. You didn’t post any supporting information, so we’ll go based off the video alone. The call could have been “a man and a woman were seen on cctv by security with guns and drugs” I’m just saying, it’s for damn sure they weren’t responding to a noise complain with rifles and tact gear. I will say, the commanding officer was definitely too much but the subjects were not searched, we don’t know what the guy on the floor may have behind his back, he was told specific commands that didn’t include “reach behind your back where I can’t see your hands”. Look, action is faster than reaction. 9 times out of 10 if th guy on the floor were to have pulled out a gun from his back he would have shot the officer before the officer was able to react in time. It’s a proven thing and you can search for videos if you’d like. The officer won’t be indicted because the suspect did in fact reach behind his back to where we couldn’t see what was there. Point blank. It definitely is a harsh shoot, but it’s justified as far as the video shows.

#7 what i mean is what constitutes non-compliance according to your training? because i have seen people get taken down aggressively while cops yell STOP RESISTING and the suspect is doing nothing but laying on the ground getting beat up, moving as little as physically possible under the circumstance. what i mean is do you guys take into consideration that when you are being hit or tased that there are certain physical reactions that cannot be subdued if you are the person being attacked? or does compliance mean you have to resist any sort of movement despite what is being done to you? basically, it's hard to not resist an assault that you believe is unwarranted, at a physical reactionary level. but it is usually exactly what is used to justify a charge of resisting arrest. do you as an officer ever consider this?

lol

@boof