ok, so who's the pedo?

[Bodey]

lmao @ spooky being part of the culprit.

who knows guys, it coulda been my controversial threads of alpha heterosexuals doing some closet homosexual shit. i bet the pedofile himself ejaculated to that thread.

that whole fbi shit though had me crackin up. people dont actually believe that right? cuz if THAT'S what our govt is doing-- runnin investigations for fuckin netcees-- we're probably gonna have another 9/11 soon and the new conspiracy will be because of fellow hip hop sites. swallowing our culture's youth! the madness.

So was that Strikta email a trololol or legit?

I thought NCs just got hax0red?

Either way ...

[Scott Akers]

first thing i said to strikta was lama was trolling him or the other way around.

if this where true, the fbi would go undercover before deleting shit. i never heard of them actually deleting stuff, in my friends case they subpeona'd the site so they can go undercover on it.

the where literally boarding with the guy until he slipped up.

like i said tho on a site i ran we tripped anti spam errors for spamming to much but i doubt thats the case because everything else works.

and IDK what happened with that case, idk if he really a pedofile or just made funny pics of babies and ppl got offended.

[Frank Metts]

The FBI shutting down netcees because of its pedophilia ring is as believable as dia getting laid from a sober chick

Netcees is down from abuse

Remember lama did this shit with bragginwrites right before he GAVE it away to start netcees

Netcees was built from the ground up and just took two planes to its main towers, shits about to collapse on itself because its unstable


I mean the nwo shut down netcees because of chhyeeahhh exposing them constantly

[ill nik-A]

I'm lost fill me in

[Frank Metts]

Dia you are full of shit ... They have FBI agents whom do watch computer activity but they are looking for serious threats

I can bet the presidents life gets threatened online a hundred times a day but nothing happens m

And you need to prove you have a positive character to sue for defamation, once strik pulled up any and all convos about his sibling you'd lose

Plus is a civil case and they're a joke

Not a single law was even close to being broken, your full of complete shit

[Scott Akers]

child molestation isn't a serious crime? like I said they would go undercover before anything else, especially if the culprit is known to share pictures online.

also you have your laws confused, they can't do nothing for me talking shit about strikta's sister, but they can do shit to strikta and anyone else if they use pictures without someones permission, that's if someone pushed it.

you know what?

freedom of speech.

they couldn't do anything to that dude that said he was going to kill a bunch of kids on facebook.

and you know there is a reason, tiny pic and all the other sites has a rule against using someones picture without someones permission, thats why im able to get whatever removed, i can get anything removed tbh.

[Split]

Originally Posted by Allen Knight

gone



also what the fuck is this thread about/ why was it started

[Scott Akers]

someone tripped the pedo detector on nc.


:)

[Frank Metts]

Child molestation is a serious crime when taken seriously

But I can bet there are hundreds of pics of 17 years old girls floating around

And if you couldn't use someone's pics without permission then tabloid mags wouldn't exist, sites like mr skin couldn't be up , paparazzi wouldn't exist either .. Once a pic is made public unless otherwise noted it is technically public property

You really need to check your laws on that because I know I'm right and your talking out of your ass

Also freedom of speech has limitations, if you were freely aloud to speak then why would their be laws against verbal abuse ? Why can they use what you say and call it a hate crime ?

Dude your soo lost its unreal

#lawyered

[Scott Akers]

Child molestation is a serious crime when taken seriously

"who doesn't take child molestation seirous?"


But I can bet there are hundreds of pics of 17 years old girls floating around

"your delusional if you think you can post pictures of kids everywhere, there is no legit site with that shit on it"

And if you couldn't use someone's pics without permission then tabloid mags wouldn't exist, sites like mr skin couldn't be up , paparazzi wouldn't exist either .. Once a pic is made public unless otherwise noted it is technically public property

"tabloids are payed off, paparazzi is payed off, if it wasn't for those guys there wouldn't celebrities, and tell that to 50 cent, you can't use someones pic just because they posted it on facebook, that is against the rules on fb and can actually get your account banned"


You really need to check your laws on that because I know I'm right and your talking out of your ass

"your the one thats talking out of your ass"

Also freedom of speech has limitations, if you were freely aloud to speak then why would their be laws against verbal abuse ? Why can they use what you say and call it a hate crime ?

"freedom of speech has no limitations what so ever, you know how many people commit suicide over internet bullying, they can't do shit to internet bullies."

Dude your soo lost its unreal

"i think your lost"

"but then again you think its ok to post naked pics of kids, and use other peoples picture without there permission."

#lawyered

lol i think we have our pedo.

[Frank Metts]

Your a serious idiot

Tabloids And paparazzi are not paid off that's why stars attack them on occasion , yes they sometimes get permission but most of the time they don't

And no where did I say it was ok to post pics I said their are prob hundreds of barely under age girls on the net hell most of time probably post them themselves now adays

And freedom of speech def has its limitations, defamation of character is a crime that is mainly committed with your words ... Why do right wing red neck racist whom get permits to protest get arrested for what they say ?

How can cops openly take photos on a stakeout without a warrant? If your logic was true then they would be useless in court because police have the same laws as us ( that's just one of the many examples I can give you )

I can openly sit outside of your house with a camera and take as many pics as I want as long as I'm not trespassing I can then use those pics because the picture itself is my property

Do you think celebs like when a dude sits on a hill and takes pics of them tanning naked or smoking pot ? No they don't but the most they can do is file a boring civil suit, but I can file a civil suit against you right now for anything I feel needs to be decided in a court ( not a court of law by the way )

[Scott Akers]

[Your a serious idiot

Tabloids And paparazzi are not paid off that's why stars attack them on occasion , yes they sometimes get permission but most of the time they don't

you don't get it.

every time the paparazi/media gets on the star, every time they attack them, they make more fucking money

I don't see any paparazi or media outlet using a celebs picture without their permission.

gawker won their law suite against hogan because hogan couldn't prove that gawker wasn't in there freedom of speech right. and he appealed that verdict, which was dumb, putting sex tapes on ur website has nothing to do with freedom of speech

And no where did I say it was ok to post pics I said their are prob hundreds of barely under age girls on the net hell most of time probably post them themselves now adays

sure but if someone reports them you act like that website won't get shut down, it will eventually, the owner will get locked up if the content isn't remove, you are responsible for everything your users post on your site.

And freedom of speech def has its limitations, defamation of character is a crime that is mainly committed with your words ... Why do right wing red neck racist whom get permits to protest get arrested for what they say ?

its only defamation if it's not true, watch that judge judy episode

How can cops openly take photos on a stakeout without a warrant? If your logic was true then they would be useless in court because police have the same laws as us ( that's just one of the many examples I can give you )
this point was to dumb to even elaborate on

I can openly sit outside of your house with a camera and take as many pics as I want as long as I'm not trespassing I can then use those pics because the picture itself is my property

sure you can, you can't post the shit online or use it for monetary or personal gain, or even without my permission, seriously all it takes is a cease and desist letter.

Do you think celebs like when a dude sits on a hill and takes pics of them tanning naked or smoking pot ? No they don't but the most they can do is file a boring civil suit, but I can file a civil suit against you right now for anything I feel needs to be decided in a court ( not a court of law by the way )


you already made this point, and everytime that happens the celeb makes more money, celebs can take pictures all they want, who ever they sell them to is liable, they mostly sell them to TMZ or some where like that, you aint a celeb until you on TMZ, and stars know that, you ever think they purposely get them self caught?

[Scott Akers]

this girl tried to counter sue this dude for calling her a bitch every where, judge judy fucking said, its only defamation if its not true.. ROFL.


that lady gos hard.

u can't just open up a fucking hotel or something like that and put peoples faces on it, same gos for different scenarios online.

when i do a legit website project i make sure all the images are licensed and shit.

[Frank Metts]

Ok here's your rebuttals to freedom of speech and cyber bulling just to prove you full of shit I pulled this right from a law site


a new law that makes cyberbullying a crime. It is now a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $500 and 90 days in jail, to harass someone over the Internet.

Harassment is defined under the law as causing a reasonable person to suffer "substantial emotional distress." It also covers communications by an adult to a child under the age of 18 that would cause a reasonable parent to fear for the child's well-being. The law applies to many different types of electronic communications, including e-mail, instant messaging, and texting between mobile phones.


So freedom of speech is out the window and you were technically cyber bullying strikta about his sister ...

That's proof # 1 that's your full of shit and know nothing about laws or Americas judicial system

And FYI judge Judy is a show, made for TV

[Frank Metts]

Pulled right from legal zoom



The Video Voyeurism Prevention Act prohibits the photographing or videotaping of a naked person without his or her permission in a gym, tanning salon, dressing room or anywhere else where one expects a "reasonable expectation of privacy." Violators can expect fines of up to $100,000 and/or up to a year in prison.

This doesn't necessarily make it illegal for someone to snap your photo without your permission though. For instance, if you're just walking down the street and someone takes a picture, they're well within their rights no matter how violated you might feel. But if someone takes a picture of you without your permission while you're getting ready to shower at the gym, it's against the law. This law isn't limited to camera phones but also includes camcorders, cameras, and digital cameras.


How's that egg on your face feel ?

[Scott Akers]

you can snap a photo all you want dude, but you can't use it without someones permission, look at all the picture sites and including facebook, if someone uses your picture without your permission you can have it removed and people banned from them services, if I see my picture on facebook someones getting banned LOL.

I can't tell you how many times i had my picture removed from tinypic, imageshack, ect, I could literally have any picture on the fucking internet removed if i wanted.

as for cyberbullying, you got to prove that the person wasn't in there freedom of speech right, which would be hard to do over petty dead sister/dead mother jokes.

I doubt you could do that for shitty forums because I could always say someone edited my post, that crime is more serious on facebook and shit.

a lot of cyberbullying cases got thrown out because it was proven that the offender was in their freedom of speech right.

also your cop snapping pictures theory is flawed because they have to get the right to use that evidence in court before they do anything with it, you can get that right through the court/state in certain cases.

[God Of War]

yeah you cant use someones pic illegally. esp ont he net if people have an issue with it they can have websites took down, lawsuits, etc

[Hush]

He whose name shall not be spoken lawsuit ugly.

[Scott Akers]

Originally Posted by God Of War

yeah you cant use someones pic illegally. esp ont he net if people have an issue with it they can have websites took down, lawsuits, etc

yeagh some stars dont care if they get free promotion.

Britney spears use to pay off the paparazii. she'd hire her own paparazzi and shit.

there was this one that just died that was chasing justin beiber, he said beibs was smoking pot.

but I am ocd about getting images licensed before i use them on a site.

i guess most avi's/gifs are even at risk.