this theory doesn't make sense in my head yet

[...the Nagger]

I'll try to make sense of it

everything in our life naturally, goes through a cycle.

weather, history, planetary orbits, etc

what if we outlive (or outlived) our cycle?

[...the Nagger]

also, take note as to how a cell looks2 like a galaxy

what if they are?

what if we (living too long to have our energy in our body cycled) begin to kill ourselves, because we're around to long? (ie cancer)

cells die in our body all the time. apparently galaxies die off too.

it takes longer for a galaxy of course, but that's because of our consciousness right?

this is where is hard for me to tie in or explain everything together as a whole lol

[Chyeahhh!!!]

Originally Posted by ...the Munster

also, take note as to how a cell looks2 like a galaxy

yessir, everything revolves, take note of what this guy is saying folks, we all abide by the same characteristics from a physics standpoint, laws and properties. This is my favorite post this year, fucking bravo here Ed. How do galaxys operatate? then how do solar systems operate? the spiral mechanism, fibonacci sequence. Preach on it brother I'm anxious to see how you think all this relates. Infinite possibilites my man

[...the Nagger]

Originally Posted by Edgar AlPo

yessir, everything revolves, take note of what this guy is saying folks, we all abide by the same characteristics from a physics standpoint, laws and properties. This is my favorite post this year, fucking bravo here Ed. How do galaxys operatate? then how do solar systems operate? the spiral mechanism, fibonacci sequence. Preach on it brother I'm anxious to see how you think all this relates. Infinite possibilites my man

lol, word

[Ghost1]

Anything could happen at the end of a cycle....a new one could begin....or everything could expire seems to be the glaring obv.....but i think more likely an evolved cyclical alteration would occur/has occured.

[...the Nagger]

Originally Posted by Bags

Anything could happen at the end of a cycle....a new one could begin....or everything could expire seems to be the glaring obv.....but i think more likely an evolved cyclical alteration would occur/has occured.

I don't think we would be able to see the entire effect due to our consciousness level (in order words, we're too small!)

[...the Nagger]

we prolly live within some other entity is what I'm saying

and if we live to long not only will we kill ourselves but we risk the chance of harming the enitity? does that make sense?

[Ghost1]

Thats deep. U high already? Lol

[...the Nagger]

no, but this is what I think about when that time comes (sometimes)

other times I'm developing ingenious plans to trap wimmen in my bed and puttin together ill outfits

[Ghost1]

Lmfao. No doubt.

[...the Nagger]

but for real, what of cancer is literally colonies in your body that figured out how to survive forever/leave their galaxy etc lol?

like they became so smart, they're tryna do something now, inside you, and don't realize they're killing you in their efforts

or they somehow blow themselves up inside you

[Chyeahhh!!!]

Originally Posted by ...the Munster

like they became so smart, they're tryna do something now, inside you, and don't realize they're killing you in their efforts

like us and the Earth. Again, abiding by the same principles

[Split]

Originally Posted by ...the Munster

but for real, what of cancer is literally colonies in your body that figured out how to survive forever/leave their galaxy etc lol?

like they became so smart, they're tryna do something now, inside you, and don't realize they're killing you in their efforts

or they somehow blow themselves up inside you

current laws of physics say that "molecular" style of life exists only on the one we know now. So our galaxy isn't an atom of some larger universe, and electrons aren't the stars of some other small universe etc

[...the Nagger]

Originally Posted by Split

current laws of physics say that "molecular" style of life exists only on the one we know now. So our galaxy isn't an atom of some larger universe, and electrons aren't the stars of some other small universe etc

I understand what you're saying in terms of "complex life"

but what I'm talking about isn't the same concept idt

[Split]

Originally Posted by ...the Munster

I understand what you're saying in terms of "complex life"

but what I'm talking about isn't the same concept idt

Word. u should check out Into the Wormhole.

they had one episode where they talked about macroscopic life, and how cities and galaxies both fulfilled all the criteria to be considered life forms. it was mad interesting and they didn't twist anything around

they also showed how the cycles of a city mimicked that of people, which explains the lifelike qualities


@namix there must be a POSSIBILITY for the opposite of a concept to exist.just because it can exist doesn't mean it has to within a given system ie our universe

[namix]

Originally Posted by Split

@namix there must be a POSSIBILITY for the opposite of a concept to exist.just because it can exist doesn't mean it has to within a given system ie our universe

the concept of it IS the possibility though, no?

i hear you tho, a concept can be real or just possible. and in fact, a concept can be quite real to one person, but only possible to the next -- and depending on their perspective and perception, perhaps even impossible (e.g. indigenous tribes seeing ships come across the seas lead to very dissimilar historical accounts, due to the fact that "concept" was previously either impossible or only possible for them, so without 'shared experiences' to anchor that new experience to, some thought the ships were like flying - some thought they were beasts, and some literally couldn't even see them)

[namix]

Originally Posted by Split

current laws of physics say that "molecular" style of life exists only on the one we know now. So our galaxy isn't an atom of some larger universe, and electrons aren't the stars of some other small universe etc

consider the fact that much of the supporting math behind physics, way, way back - began with assumptions.... self-defined variables we threw into equations while trying to make the equations work

ultimately, the laws of physics - while mostly agreeable to the world at large - are built on theories, which were built, at some juncture, on assumptions.

we keep on thinking we'll find the smallest sub-atomic particle, for example, by accelerating larger particles at each other....

What do they see? the same thing over and over again - but many of the ingenious folks in the scientific community are so close to the trees they dont see the forest.

the answer isn't in a finite-sized, 'smallest particle' --- it is IN THE PATTERN. the fact that we can break down shit further and further, or look further and further into the cosmos, and see the same relationships.

"Seek and ye shall find".... there was so much confirmation bias based on our physical experience and what 'great minds' before us taught us, that we fail to see that it's not that we're not finding the right answers -- we're asking the wrong questions.

What limited our understanding in the past was technology - what limits it now is technology - technology breeds more technology, and the evolution of technology becomes exponential --- which is why subject matter from like the late 1800s and early 1900s was disproved in the late 1900s... and why subject matter I learned in the 90s has been disproven in less than 20 years, and why shit we discovered a decade ago is being re-evaluated already lol.


The providence of "microcosms" and "macrocosms", and their intimate (often fractal) relationship IS evident in all sciences, and supported by many faiths and philosophies, ancient and modern alike.



so alas, i say to you: FUCK THE LAWS OF PHYSICS!!!

lol, for real though - it's relevance is only as meaningful as our desire to be 'ruled' by those 'laws'.


the laws of physics which are most likely to withstand the test of time will be the ones that are observed in other subject matters as well -- the real 'make-up' of the universe is seen most clearly when our (fallible) SCIENCE aligns with our (fallible) FAITHS/beliefs and the two combine to ring truth within the individual beholding them. :)

[Nigma]

Originally Posted by ...the Munster

but for real, what of cancer is literally colonies in your body that figured out how to survive forever/leave their galaxy etc lol?

like they became so smart, they're tryna do something now, inside you, and don't realize they're killing you in their efforts

or they somehow blow themselves up inside you

Also cancer is literally rapidly growing cells, which directly correlates to the overpopulation issues we're having. Our race is literally a cancer in the universe. Cells which manifest into properties beyond most cells, go void, rapidly produce, die off, and begin a new cycle. A verse topical I'm going to write is actually about this very topic. Comparing it at three levels, from the micro cell, to the mid plain of consciousness, us, and the macro, being the galactic pattern of life. It's like a fractal you can follow and trace back from the biggest conceivable concept of space down to smallest form of matter we have the capability of seeing.

[Witty]

A molecule only behaves as we expect a molecule to behave when we view it, unviewed it moves as a field, just the effect of looking at a molecule changes it completely, and more interestingly, the second we view them, bouncing light off them, they seem to go back in time and act as if they have always behaved in such a way.

Everything we do effects everything, even down to the microscopic universe.

[...the Nagger]

Originally Posted by Witty

A molecule only behaves as we expect a molecule to behave when we view it, unviewed it moves as a field, just the effect of looking at a molecule changes it completely, and more interestingly, the second we view them, bouncing light off them, they seem to go back in time and act as if they have always behaved in such a way.

Everything we do effects everything, even down to the microscopic universe.

so we could possibly effect bigger things too then right? things bigger than us. too big for us to comprehend

the microscopic universe certainly effects us. viruses, cells, etc all that stuff is microscopic.

we could be microscopic to something else and effecting it?