can we just be straight forward here

boof · 06-18-2016, 12:51 AM

fact; trump & the clintons are long time pals

fact; the dnc has conspired with the media since may 2015 to downplay hillary's negatives, play up her positives, and create a republican candidate with high contrast

it's quite obvious trump's been put there as a loud mouthed buffoon to scare everyone into voting hillary.

hillary is so shitty that a third of america still wants to vote trump

a third of america is terrified of a trump presidency so they're going to vote hillary

WHY WOULDN'T EVERYONE HERE AND THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WITH COMMON SENSE AND THE OTHER THIRD OF AMERICA JUST VOTE FOR THE THIRD CANDIDATE INSTEAD?

I DONT GET IT; besides not knowing the first few things obviously. but at this point, who doesnt know that????

the only thing keeping a third person from winning is the idea that it's going to be a waste of a vote,

but why is everyone voting against a candidate when they can instead vote in favor of one that is just as qualified as the more qualified one and more genuine, and good intention-ed than both?

i just don't get it.

independents are 42% of registered voters? 46% of democrats voted for the other democrat? that seems like a huge number of people that could prevent either of these candidates from winning?

06-18-2016, 12:51 AM	#1
boof Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 1,620 Rep Power: 21316672	can we just be straight forward here fact; trump & the clintons are long time pals fact; the dnc has conspired with the media since may 2015 to downplay hillary's negatives, play up her positives, and create a republican candidate with high contrast it's quite obvious trump's been put there as a loud mouthed buffoon to scare everyone into voting hillary. hillary is so shitty that a third of america still wants to vote trump a third of america is terrified of a trump presidency so they're going to vote hillary WHY WOULDN'T EVERYONE HERE AND THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WITH COMMON SENSE AND THE OTHER THIRD OF AMERICA JUST VOTE FOR THE THIRD CANDIDATE INSTEAD? I DONT GET IT; besides not knowing the first few things obviously. but at this point, who doesnt know that???? the only thing keeping a third person from winning is the idea that it's going to be a waste of a vote, but why is everyone voting against a candidate when they can instead vote in favor of one that is just as qualified as the more qualified one and more genuine, and good intention-ed than both? i just don't get it. independents are 42% of registered voters? 46% of democrats voted for the other democrat? that seems like a huge number of people that could prevent either of these candidates from winning?