someone help me out (big butt lovers enter thread)

[Destroyer]

in the sir mix a lot song baby got back, when he says "36 24 36 ha ha only if she's 5'3"

how does that make any sense?

[Ghost1]

Chest waist hips height

R u asking if they truly make this model of woman? Lol

[uh-oh]

i am so confused by this thread

i feel like destoryer is asking something other than what he is asking, but it doesnt read like it.

but as bags said its titties waist ass, followed by her height

he wants a short thick bitch with a slim waist. like everyone should.

[Destroyer]

here's my question
those measurements are on a specific area of a woman
they don't change no matter how tall or short the woman is...

[~RustyGunZ~]

but he wants em short

[Ghost1]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

here's my question
those measurements are on a specific area of a woman
they don't change no matter how tall or short the woman is...

Eh...but if she like 6 foot it'd look wack lmao

[Eŋg]

dumb as fuck

[YDK]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

here's my question
those measurements are on a specific area of a woman
they don't change no matter how tall or short the woman is...

But the proportion would change. If a bitch is a hundred feet tall a 70 inch ass is still tiny

[Destroyer]

it's still a 70 inch ass tho

[YDK]

But it would look inverted compared to the rest of a hundred foot body lol

Nobody wanna Hank hill lookin ass no matter how many inches it is

[Destroyer]

I dunno
I feel like there wouldn't be much difference in the overall look of a woman with these measurements from 5'3" to 6'
that's a 7-inch height difference
would that change the proportional look that much?

[YDK]

Yeah look at models, most of em over 6ft an look good but still kinda skinny, shrink em down just a little bit an those ass an titties look that much better

[Destroyer]

I'm gonna need pictures

[YDK]

You better start googling lol

[YDK]

Actually use this scale to see the differences

http://www.health-calc.com/body-comp...o-height-ratio

[uh-oh]

bruh

i just googled celebrity measurements

salma hayek is 5'2''

36-25-37 (basically the same just wider hips and waist)

kate upton is 5'10''

34-25-36

the extra height means extra width. upton is an anamoly with basically no ribcage and all titties tho, i'm guessing these measurements were in her prime.

but kate upton has no ass at all. so you can see how 36 hips means nothing the taller you get.

[uh-oh]

i just seen scarlett johansenn is 36-26-36 at 5'3''

while her body is banging, her ass never inspired anything in da gods heart as much as her titties have.

so i will admit confusion to this conundrum, and just say sir mix alot probably prefers 36-24-40 at 5'3''

although in his videos his big booty bitches ain't like the big booty bitches of today, so maybe he did prefer those exact measurements

if this thread was a troll to get me to learn up on this useless knowledge it has succeeded.

[uh-oh]

yea i will conclude my findings with maybe destro has a point. since the final measurement is hips not ass my theories have been thrown in a LOOP

jessica biel has the same measurements as scarlett johanssen or whatever, but she is 5'7

biel loses horrifically in a slaughter as far as titties are concerned, but biel's ass annihalates johansenns

but the measurements are the same

i'm guessing in biels STATURE at 5'7 her ribs are beastlier then scarletts, so that contributes to the titty measurement

but since the final measurement is hips, and not actual booty, they are the same, and biels just bubbles out where as scarlett has normal uninspiring white booty

im going to sleep. FUCK YOU

[Sovereign]

Or you could just switch to hentai.

They can look like whatever you want.

[Destroyer]

lmao
dead @ da god