Quote:
Originally Posted by Coop
“If you can’t attack the message, attack the messenger”
Look at this:
1) Fraze looks at link
2) Instead of looking at subject matter, immediately looks at source
3) Fraze doesn’t recognize the source, immediately assumes subject matter is incorrect
Lmaooo I deliberately picked some random site I never heard of because I knew this would be your reaction. There are plenty of other reputable sites reporting on this, just go search it. I’m playing chess, you on checkers.
Once you realize that, realize you’ve been doing this THE ENTIRE TIME. It’s why you’ve been wrong so much
Lol @ “use real sources” and you post a story saying the same shit as the “fake source”. Lmaooo
|
I never said it incorrect, I just said it was a bad source of news.
This is what we call the "strawman fallacy". You accusing me of doing some bad thing that you've invented (assuming your source is incorrect and not reading it) just so you can take me down for it. It's a favorite rhetorical technique of our current President.
I'm telling you to quote reputable sources because otherwise its just an article on some website. Just because someone understands Wordpress doesn't make them a subject matter expert. Do better.
I read your article, noticed the lack of basic information that would be included in any news story, then I went to find out what was actually happening.
When you finish playing board games, maybe you'll realize I posted the same thing from a reputable source to show that the "mainstream" media is reporting on this because its a legitimate story.
Don't find it strange that new world order is allowing this story on vaccination deaths? Isn't that against the pro-vaccine narrative the powers at be are trying to push in your conspiracy fantasy? Why report on this anti-vaccine story but not the BS you're pulling out of Youtube videos.
It's because real journalists have to verify a story from multiple sources before their editors let them print it. That doesn't mean they're perfect. They often misinterpret or misunderstand stories, sometimes maliciously, sometimes not. But it does mean that the stuff they print has been attribute to someone in the real world with a reputations at risk when they get things wrong.
Where as, no matter how many outright lies are included, your Youtube videos are only judged after the fact in the comment sections.
Also it's cute of you to ignore the substance of my comment, which is that
these deaths from vaccinations are only from sick elderly people who couldn't handle the side effects. If you don't care about the corona deaths, why do you care about these?
^^^ Point bolded for emphasis since you have trouble following.