View Single Post
Old 12-20-2020, 05:33 PM   #172
fraze
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 913
Battle Record: 14-24



Rep Power: 32898722
fraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fraze View Post
You can't only keep elderly people at home because people who aren't at risk are still carriers. You can't isolate at risks populations 100% because they generally need care. You would also need to isolate caretakers. But if caretakers are mixing with general population with widespread community infections, you're going to end up killing the elderly anyway.

Also, deaths and health complications AREN'T limited to the elderly. A lot of it is luck of the draw. If you get a bad case you can die or have permanent disability even if you're young and considered "healthy".

Not to mention hospital capacity. We're maxed out now with the interventions that have been put in place. When you run out of hospital capacity completely death rates will go up across the board for covid/non-covid because you can no longer keep up with treating preventable disease.
As we've discussed, "Just stay at home" is not a realistic option for stopping the spread of the virus and stopping deaths.
fraze is offline   Reply With Quote