Quote:
Originally Posted by Karaoke
Hi...
It is the deepest but not too many can take over a game or hand over a game like a steph curry or rondo...
finding a point guard who can do that is hard...
the good pgs these days are often better suited as sgs...
youre right abt the 3 position...
these days dudes can play from 3 to 4 to 5...
that's the euro shit...
No reason to argue or call a person a retard...
Its all a matter of opinion...
if your observation was that great, why aren't u a gm?...
Bye...
|
I do agree that a lot of PG's in the league are just 2's who figured out early on the best way to always have the ball is to bring it up. Still, league depth does play into what position is hardest to fill. You can couch the argument however you like, I suppose.
If you want to be technical, the hardest positions to fill probably just goes in reverse order from the 5 to 1. Finding size and skill is harder the more height is required. I just refuse to accept that point guard is the second hardest position to fill. It's also the least directly correlated to winning a championship. Which was the last team to win the championship with their PG being their best player? The Pistons? That was team D. The last Spurs title?