Quote:
Originally Posted by Coop
Who's doing the assuming here?
|
You are. I was pretty clear about that in my post, not sure how I lost you on that. Or are you going to pretend you never claimed I'm not examining the perspectives of your selected professionals?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coop
Also, please reference the evidence you have of me "unfairly evaluating the opinions of people who know more about the subject than I do"
|
See every thread where we've argued about the COVID pandemic. A key assumption on your part is that the opinions of medical professionals who are not generally experts with viruses or infectious diseases should be taken over the opinions of the CDC, the organization that was specifically created to address pandemics and is widely regarded as one of the most knowledgeable voices on the subject.
And you go way above and beyond simply disagreeing with their professional opinions. You basically accuse them of engaging in a conspiracy to willfully mislead the entire world population and trick people into taking a vaccine for some nefarious (but as yet unspecified) purpose. What part of that is a unbiased evaluation based on the facts?
Even assuming your medical experts are equally credible (but to be clear they are NOT), at best you would be able to claim that the science is controversial or inconclusive. Jumping from that to a worldwide conspiracy is not supported by evidence and a clear indication of your biased perspective.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coop
Very easy to say blanket statements like this INSTEAD OF individually addressing any specific point made.
|
Just following your lead my friend. Besides every time I refute your arguments point by point you just ignore any comments you find inconvenient and goal post shift to focus on some minor semantic or technical detail where you feel you are correct.
See your upcoming response for examples. I will also accept a non response as proof that your argument is baseless.