Quote:
Originally Posted by fraze
It's funny to me that we're hyper focused on a handful of people (literally in the 10s or 100s) that have a survivable response to the vaccine, but you have no problem ignoring 4000s people dying every day.
|
Not to mention, it's not like it isn't widely known the vaccine isn't tested on a huge group of people yet, it is still in the stages of perfection. Serious question, do you guys really think they mainly test/give such a costly and important thing on mostly the elderly at first by chance? It's great if it works but also the least damaging on society if it doesn't. Definitely a conspiracy theory on my part, but hell, I don't think anyone can convince me otherwise of this
Lots of people have died and risked thei lives for vaccines to get the proper testing to get to this point in time where it's in a trial period for the public. It sucks that shit like this can happen but like you're saying, she isn't dead. If it is treatable, then damn, it's worth the side effect if the option is a very high risk of dying, or infecting others that will if they get it.
Side effects isn't surprising, it just sucks that it isn't as good as it can get yet. What's great is the courageous people taking the vaccine already now (and should know it is a risk this early), it's thanks to them we're moving forward with everything!
Sucks that the lady don't see it as such, and tells people not to take it instead of being an important voice in further development of it. And rooting on the people that work day and night risking to get infected themselves, some for free, with the virus to get a functional and predictable vaccine.
There's still a lot to be done, why this is surprising to some of you makes me scratch my head a little. What we're seeing here is a step in the right direction