View Single Post
Old 12-11-2020, 08:22 PM   #70
fraze
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 972
Battle Record: 14-24



Rep Power: 32898726
fraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant futurefraze has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coop View Post
Wow Mr MIT educated engineer, your math skills are impeccable.

Reducing the risk of infected doesn’t mean 70% less people dying. That would only be the case if 100% of infections led to death.



“Why not suck it up and do it”

Why should I limit my freedoms due to your unnecessary fear? How about, the people I’m supposed to be protecting, THEY STAY INSIDE. Woaaahh what a concept!
If 1000 people get infected without masks. Death rate of 1% is 10 deaths.

70% reduction is 300 infections with masks. Death rate of 1% is 3 deaths.

That is a 70% reduction is deaths. Pro-tip: Look up the commutative property of multiplication.
fraze is offline   Reply With Quote