Netcees - View Single Post

corleone · 07-24-2020, 08:59 AM

@Sharp.. someone keeps deleting my comments.. for one, I never agreed on those terms where you felt in anyway that you could post your verse on 7/16 and post another verse 8 days later on 7/24.. not only is that unprofessional, its disrespectful.. smh.. thats a DQ in my book sharp.. sorry.. I set the thread.. you lose.. my rules.. peace

ps, in the BA rules section on this site, it says..

"- No swaying for votes(your swaying in votes with a condescending approach on your second verse), no biting, no rebuttals(your second verse is a rebuttal), no feeding (your second verse is a feed) or recycling. Doing so will result in DQ."

How are you swaying in votes in this battle? Obviously, your second verse is a spin off from a topic that zuche created in the discussion forum recently and its condescending enough to cause zuche to vote, and in fact, be our first voter of the battle. Thus, zuche stated.. "Corleone verse is one of the worst I’ve ever seen." I've personally read and had seen worse verses on NC in the BA section and in the OM section but if you honestly put his comment and vote into perspective.. it oozed with all that I just stated within context, so yes, its a form of swaying for a vote, but to draw an exact line, its a sway.

How does your second verse fall into the category of being a feed? threads posted in the BA section are to include one verse from each opponent and thats all. Each comment posted by judges, opponents, and so on show as one feed for each thread. When you decided to post your second verse, it was considered a feed, as anything past your initial requirements as a battler is punishable by DQ, according to netcees.org BA site rules and regulations. Also, the initial rules that I had stated upon submission for our verses length were to be the same length as my verse or even lesser.

How is your second verse a rebuttal or for better words, falls under the category as a rebuttal? obviously, you weren't impressed with your first attempt in posting your battle verse and thus, you posted a second verse 7-8 days later to compensate for the lack of skill that you displayed in your first verse. Obviously, you felt that a second verse was needed to win this battle and that my friend, is a rebuttal.

07-24-2020, 08:59 AM	#8
corleone Shakespearian Dialect Join Date: Mar 2020 Location: Brooklyn, NY --> Allentown, PA Posts: 1,022 Battle Record: 0-3 Rep Power: 0	@Sharp.. someone keeps deleting my comments.. for one, I never agreed on those terms where you felt in anyway that you could post your verse on 7/16 and post another verse 8 days later on 7/24.. not only is that unprofessional, its disrespectful.. smh.. thats a DQ in my book sharp.. sorry.. I set the thread.. you lose.. my rules.. peace ps, in the BA rules section on this site, it says.. "- No swaying for votes(your swaying in votes with a condescending approach on your second verse), no biting, no rebuttals(your second verse is a rebuttal), no feeding (your second verse is a feed) or recycling. Doing so will result in DQ." How are you swaying in votes in this battle? Obviously, your second verse is a spin off from a topic that zuche created in the discussion forum recently and its condescending enough to cause zuche to vote, and in fact, be our first voter of the battle. Thus, zuche stated.. "Corleone verse is one of the worst I’ve ever seen." I've personally read and had seen worse verses on NC in the BA section and in the OM section but if you honestly put his comment and vote into perspective.. it oozed with all that I just stated within context, so yes, its a form of swaying for a vote, but to draw an exact line, its a sway. How does your second verse fall into the category of being a feed? threads posted in the BA section are to include one verse from each opponent and thats all. Each comment posted by judges, opponents, and so on show as one feed for each thread. When you decided to post your second verse, it was considered a feed, as anything past your initial requirements as a battler is punishable by DQ, according to netcees.org BA site rules and regulations. Also, the initial rules that I had stated upon submission for our verses length were to be the same length as my verse or even lesser. How is your second verse a rebuttal or for better words, falls under the category as a rebuttal? obviously, you weren't impressed with your first attempt in posting your battle verse and thus, you posted a second verse 7-8 days later to compensate for the lack of skill that you displayed in your first verse. Obviously, you felt that a second verse was needed to win this battle and that my friend, is a rebuttal. __________________ Last edited by corleone; 07-24-2020 at 09:35 AM.