Quote:
Originally Posted by Amen
Not cheaper. Both require 3rd party lab for results.
The goal is to hire people. So why Restrict.
For an example; a UA can detect excessive levels of THC for up to 3 weeks prior. A swab; 24 hours. Employers desperately need people, so rather then turn a guy away who smoked pot 3 weeks ago, they don’t care to see what he did 3 weeks ago and only concerned what you did the night before. The probability of hiring the individual is a lot higher with a swab then a UA.
|
I’m just going off what I know from personal experience.. and I’m quite knowledgeable on being a fuck up. All the jobs that I got back in the day required a drug test before you started and I had one that I didn’t smoke weed for like 2 months, and it showed up.
It’s fucked up that 3- 4 days before a UA you could smoke crack, do, do heroin while smoking meth and it won’t show up. But if smoked weed a month and a half ago it will.
Bottom line is clean your ass up before the first drug test.... and with all of the formal jobs I’ve had they threaten you like, we could pop a random drug test on you at anytime and therefore fire you, none of them ever did.
Only time that’s ever going to happen is if you’re showing up to work clearly fucked up