04-17-2019, 06:41 AM
|
#25
|
DA GOD
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Canton Ohio
Posts: 12,362
Battle Record: 1-0
Champed
- Beat Battle II
- Beat Battle V
- Beat Bags
Rep Power: 84181420
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharp
SO
Wth the abortions
Not the point of this thread that's Bernie's rambling and moderation that would make zelph respect bleak's work
But yeah
After the last time, I looked it up
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/02/ad...-abortion-law/
This sums it up more or less
-Abortions within 24 weeks
-After 24 weeks, abortions allowed if mother's health is threatened or the fetus is not viable (as determined by a doctor)
-moves abortions from criminal to health code, so penalties for doctors who perform them late would be medical board or whatever tf they have as opposed to criminal court
I think your average left of center likes the 'unviable' part and that the state cemented their own policy on abortion. Considering the Supreme Court is more likely than ever to overturn roe v Wade, I don't think it's the worst idea
|
uh
Quote:
Roe v. Wade held that states may limit abortions after fetal viability, except in cases “necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother” (New York’s old law, which predated the decision, only allowed for late-term exceptions to protect the mother’s life.) Fetal viability was defined as being the point when a fetus was “potentially able to live outside the mother’s womb, albeit with artificial aid.”
New York’s new law does not explicitly define “health.”
In what is considered a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors — physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age — relevant to the wellbeing of the patient. All these factors may relate to health. This allows the attending physician the room he needs to make his best medical judgment.”
|
__________________
EVERYBODY I KNOW GOT WEED OR GOT POWDER
BUT I AINT GOT EITHER. GOT ALOT OF DEMONS
|
|
|