Quote:
Originally Posted by ...the Munster
thank you. this was starting to get ridiculous
you tellin me this little dude can beat HOF Boxers of our generation???
like cmon yall sound silly.
y'all need top get off his D
|
Okay, I'm going to pick out some flaws in your theory here.
Roy Jones was strictly a boxer. He could punch, yes but he wasn't versatile.
Your opinion really comes out from the fact being Roy Jones was 'Bigger' than Bruce Lee... and yes, he was. However, Bruce Lee WAS versatile. He trained martial arts in a way that could defend him from the BIGGEST of opponent. Size wouldn't matter because he was trained to stand up to ANYONE. Technique plays a big part in a fight.. If you haven't got technique then 9 times out of 10 you will lose. You can't charge into an army of soldiers without a shield and expect to NOT get stabbed. Bruce Lee HAD technique and he also had MORE speed than Roy Jones in his prime. Bruce Lee holds a record of punching faster and kicking faster in 1967 than ANY man on the planet. It was recorded that his famous 'One Inch Punch' was three times more fatal than a 30mph head-on car crash. That IS fact. Roy Jones' accolades doesn't even start to compare to Bruce Lee's.
Any man can punch and knock someone out if they hit the right spot. Not every man is versatile ontop of being able to punch three times harder than a 30MPH head-on car crash.
ALSO - you say Bruce Lee wasn't a fight... he was just in movies...
Think to yourself... Why was he in movies? Why did people want him to star in movies? How did he get noticed?
Because of his fighting and incredible combat/fighting techniques/style.