Quote:
Originally Posted by veritas
the point of my path is that I am going to provide sources of supposed facts. You will then say that these sources do not meet your "rigorous criteria". Even though the realm of spirituality and science are unfortunately opposite. It is not like Standford or MIT are doing research into the persecution of Christians.
However, when I post statistics of Christian death I don't know that you get to just say, "Oh biased article, discard." Because we can show bias in anything. That is one of the tenets of research. Which of course you know, especially after you have equipped this new persona you are trying. and this bad path I am on could prove your own bias as well....which you deny lol. at any rate. My mission continues. have a good day, Seth.
|
Bias is when you support or oppose something and use that view to shape evidence and facts into whatever holds up your cause. So a source about persecuted Christians by a Muslim organization would probably be biased too. A report from a respected journalist or research company would not be. Any organization that would research any sort of persecution would have no reason not to with Christians. It’s not rocket science.
I’m not sure why the American Baptist community is suddenly going all fake news on the world this past few weeks. You’re acting like the little brother that’s mad his big brother is getting mommy’s attention.
And what persona? Researching things to formulate opinions? I’ve always done that, always been in debate mode. It’s been my thing no matter my time on NC. Eat a dick with that bullshit Amen lite.