View Single Post
Old 02-27-2019, 12:21 AM   #63
~RustyGunZ~
(ง'̀-'́)ง
 
~RustyGunZ~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,844
Battle Record: 52-28

Accomplishments
-50+ wins

Champed
-Summer Classic VIII
-Netcees Battle League
-BA Picture
-BA TagTeam
-Fight Night Cypher I
-Fight Night XXXV
-Key Grand Prix 2018 1/2

Rep Power: 85899406
~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute~RustyGunZ~ has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boof View Post
using the most notable example for you is shitty debate tactic? i dunno, if you're caught up in ego maybe. im just trying to help you understand the reality of it and how far its gone already.

you said it only happens when protesters incite aggression, and 1 person getting hurt shouldnt mean less funding. i gave you a very over the top example with lots of injuries so you understand better about why we think demilitarization should happen.

but its only extreme in the sense of calling in private mercenary to help.

keep in mind what i told you about new anti protesting bills and you can make a good guess these military tactics will be used again domestically if anyone stands up to corporation > people mentality as persistently as the natives did.

hopefully you get it
It's called appeal to extremes

Another bad logic choice you make is oversimplifying causes, which is why I'm having this back and forth with you. It's not about the X therefore Y, it's about finding an equation that gets anywhere. Yelling at the wall about protesters getting hurt by the police, and bernie not wanting them having tanks, does in no way support a negation to my opinion that a team of he and AOC could result in a police state (which I said was unlikely, along with the argument that the far right will lead to a fascist state)

I still don't see why you think you have a high ground to talk to me with such bravado. I think you spend too much time speaking in echochambers at your protest meetings.

To your next post, the el something one, not going back to find it but el c... something. I've since been trying to find evidence to support your claim for you since you can't, and there isn't much useful. Since you aren't interested in backing your claims, I'll admit defeat to myself on behalf of you that local police don't need tanks.

Otherwise you've made 0 logical sense, and in no way have been throwing great knowledge to myself or any other people reading. There isn't a version of a modern democracy where corporations aren't in bed to a great extent with government, and there will never be a world where they won't find a way to get what they want. Your protest have not done a thing to combat that (don't go on some stupid rant about social issues and get off topic)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Answer
The BrainLord is in my top 5 content wise on the strength of what I’ve read from him on NC in recent years. I’d pick him to beat Answer over 20 lines
FREE PHAROAHS ARMY
~RustyGunZ~ is offline   Reply With Quote