Quote:
Originally Posted by veritas
I proved it philosophically DMS. I would vault it back to you and ask, how does omnipotence tie into being continually bound to logic? Is the latter a prerequisite for the former? ISNT the whole point of omnipotence being not bound to anything but what it chooses to be bound to?
This seems simple to me.
You make these threads to challenge me (which don't) as subcon subterfuge to wrestle with your own uncertainty.
Or maybe you just enjoy challenging me?
|
I didn’t make this to challenge you, actually, but I can’t not challenge something illogical, which god must be if he has any potential to be anything he isn’t(potentiality), because he must be Pure actuality to be the first mover.