Quote:
Originally Posted by Edgar AlPo
You know me too well my old statured challengened friend.
We are all but of one race, the human racee. To pick and choose what denominative skin factors and enthnetic subsets deserve a lesser fate have godlike implications which inturn beckons the question.....to be in the human race and show this level of inhumanity..do we ourselves all not deserve the same fate in question?
Do not disappoint me again like this netcees. Were are smarter than this.
|
Humanity, as in which race of people, was implied in the question though.
The question you asked was IF we HAD to choose a race (ie. a grouping of people), which would it be...to which I responded with the only logical and humane answer...the one with least people.
I didn't choose a skin colour, nor a geographical region. It isn't a question of inhumanity, the opposite in fact, should this hypothetical situation actually arise, and we HAD to choose a group or race if you want to put it like that, to destroy in order to preserve all others, the most humane option would simply be the smallest group.
Either that, or let everyone die. Damage limitation, as I previously stated