You used the word killer literally to defend the case they cannot literally be killers. Your case was that this was true because regardless of experience in combat, someone else could best you in a different arena of combat. So you're saying that no matter the tool of potential killing, that someone else may posses a tool of killing that would better suite an opposing arena of killing. So your logic says no one can be a killer unless they have the ultimate tool to kill.
This is stupid logic. You cannot defend it in a way that isn't dumb.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Answer
The BrainLord is in my top 5 content wise on the strength of what I’ve read from him on NC in recent years. I’d pick him to beat Answer over 20 lines
|
FREE PHAROAHS ARMY
Last edited by ~RustyGunZ~; 10-12-2018 at 03:08 PM.
|